Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Doc] Update opcode for var-positional arguments #4446

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2017

Conversation

mkoledoye
Copy link
Contributor

BUILD_MAP_UNPACK_WITH_CALL was duplicated as the opcode for both var-positional and var-keyword arguments. The opcode for the former was updated as BUILD_TUPLE_UNPACK_WITH_CALL.

`BUILD_MAP_UNPACK_WITH_CALL` was duplicated as the opcode for both var-positional and var-keyword arguments. The opcode for the former was updated as `BUILD_TUPLE_UNPACK_WITH_CALL`.
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @mkoledoye for the PR, and @serhiy-storchaka for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.6.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2017
`BUILD_MAP_UNPACK_WITH_CALL` was duplicated as the opcode for both var-positional and var-keyword arguments. The opcode for the former was updated as `BUILD_TUPLE_UNPACK_WITH_CALL`.
(cherry picked from commit 0c71653)
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-4457 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch.

@mkoledoye mkoledoye deleted the patch-1 branch November 18, 2017 23:27
serhiy-storchaka pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2017
`BUILD_MAP_UNPACK_WITH_CALL` was duplicated as the opcode for both var-positional and var-keyword arguments. The opcode for the former was updated as `BUILD_TUPLE_UNPACK_WITH_CALL`.
(cherry picked from commit 0c71653)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants