Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

bpo-11063: Use more reliable way to detect if it exists #4343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2017
Merged

bpo-11063: Use more reliable way to detect if it exists #4343

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2017

Conversation

berkerpeksag
Copy link
Member

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag commented Nov 8, 2017 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

serhiy-storchaka
serhiy-storchaka approved these changes Nov 8, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems this check works. But I'm not an autoconf expert and I don't know whether there is more idiomatic way to check the existence of a function.

@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag merged commit 0e163d2 into python:master Nov 8, 2017
@berkerpeksag berkerpeksag deleted the 11063-tweak branch November 8, 2017 21:43
terryjreedy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2021
@terryjreedy
[3.9] bpo-41841: Prepare IDLE NEWS for 3.9.2 (#GH-4343)
fd668bc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@berkerpeksag @serhiy-storchaka @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot