-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.2k
bpo-46333: Honor module
parameter in ForwardRef
#30536
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
JelleZijlstra
merged 13 commits into
python:main
from
aha79:bpo_46333_eq_and_repr_for_forwardref
Feb 17, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
980ea28
bpo-46333: Honor `module` parameter in ForwardRef
andreas-h-sie 82fa061
📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
blurb-it[bot] ac51d98
Update Lib/test/test_typing.py
aha79 d643861
Update Lib/typing.py
aha79 ac16c5c
Update Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-01-11-15-54-15.bpo-46333.B1faiF.rst
aha79 a2e1377
Update ACKS
andreas-h-sie c084fdb
Update Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-01-11-15-54-15.bpo-46333.B1faiF.rst
aha79 7577633
Remove module output from __repr__
andreas-h-sie d608058
Merge branch 'bpo_46333_eq_and_repr_for_forwardref' of github.com:aha…
andreas-h-sie 3df5009
take out repr change
andreas-h-sie 42fc26b
Update Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-01-11-15-54-15.bpo-46333.B1faiF.rst
aha79 9dd2f8f
add tests for ForwardRef.hash
andreas-h-sie 94c9a69
move ForwardRef.__hash__ test to correct function
andreas-h-sie File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions
4
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2022-01-11-15-54-15.bpo-46333.B1faiF.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
The :meth:`__eq__` and :meth:`__hash__` methods of | ||
:class:`typing.ForwardRef` now honor the ``module`` parameter of | ||
:class:`typing.ForwardRef`. Forward references from different | ||
modules are now differentiated. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I wonder if this test is run directly, will
__name__
be `main``? Wouldn't that make the test pass incorrectly? (Throwing this question out there because I'm not too sure myself). Maybe we should be safe and give it a distinct name?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test is to ensure that
ForwardRef
withmodule
set is different fromForwardRef
withmodule
not set (That was previsously not the case). The actual value ofmodule
(or__name__
) is not relevant. Under the hood the comparison isNone
vsstr
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My bad, thanks for pointing that out. I mistakenly assumed it would grab a default value from the current scope to populate
module
in things likeClassVar['int']
due to the_type_check
/_type_convert
function (I'm now shocked that it doesn't and only does that forTypedDict
).Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, unfortunately the current module is not captured automatically.
The current scope/module is typicallly obtained by
get_type_hints
because a class knows its module (and so all ForwardRefs in member annotations can be correctly resolved. But each forward Ref does originally not know its module).However for type aliases this does not work, and there one needs the explicit module.
For example
Json = Union[ List['Json'], Dict[str,'Json'], int, float, bool, None ]
cannot be exported (and expect to work) unless one sets the
module
for each forward ref.