Skip to content

[3.5] bpo-30813: Fix unittest when hunting refleaks (#2502) #2506

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2017
Merged

[3.5] bpo-30813: Fix unittest when hunting refleaks (#2502) #2506

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 30, 2017
+6 −0

Conversation

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Jun 30, 2017

bpo-11798, bpo-16662, bpo-16935, bpo-30813: Skip
test_discover_with_module_that_raises_SkipTest_on_import() and
test_discover_with_init_module_that_raises_SkipTest_on_import() of
test_unittest when hunting reference leaks using regrtest.
(cherry picked from commit e4f9a2d)

@vstinner
bpo-30813: Fix unittest when hunting refleaks (#2502)
28d4f72 
bpo-11798, bpo-16662, bpo-16935, bpo-30813: Skip
test_discover_with_module_that_raises_SkipTest_on_import() and
test_discover_with_init_module_that_raises_SkipTest_on_import() of
test_unittest when hunting reference leaks using regrtest.
(cherry picked from commit e4f9a2d)
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2017
Merged
@vstinner vstinner merged commit 714afcc into python:3.5 Jun 30, 2017
@vstinner vstinner deleted the unittest_cleanup35 branch June 30, 2017 11:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@vstinner @the-knights-who-say-ni