-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-43249: sqlite3_column_bytes() must follow sqlite_column_blob() #24562
Conversation
@berkerpeksag Do we need a NEWS item for this one? I'm trying to formulate something, but I find it hard to describe. Maybe something like "Improve SQLite API usage"-ish. What do you think? Also, if you permit, I'd like to add a small commit to this PR: Remove the broadly scoped
|
Nope, unless we have a test case that can be failed without this fix, I'd say it's an implementation detail and we don't need to document it.
It would be great if you could submit it as separate PR (no need to create a separate issue; you can just link that to this PR or we can treat it as a follow-up and use the same BPO issue) I guess the reason for using the same variable was restrictions imposed by C89 and/or old MSVC compiler. |
Not testable, AFAIK => no NEWS it is.
Sure, I'll do that when this PR is merged. Yes, this code predates the "C99-upgrade" of PEP 7 :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comment on the comment, but other than that LGTM!
A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated. Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase |
I have made the requested changes; please review again |
Thanks for making the requested changes! @berkerpeksag: please review the changes made to this pull request. |
Thank you! |
https://bugs.python.org/issue43249