Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-41936. Remove macros Py_ALLOW_RECURSION/Py_END_ALLOW_RECURSION #22552

Merged

Conversation

serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka commented Oct 4, 2020

Copy link
Member

@gvanrossum gvanrossum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we get @vstinner to review too?

Copy link
Member

@vstinner vstinner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be honest, I never noticed that these macros even existed, and I never noticed the PyInterpreterState.recursion_critical member.

I failed to find users of these macros outside the CPython code base, so it sounds safe to remove it, especially if it's documented in What's New in Python 3.10 (which is the case in this PR).

If someone reports the removal as a regression and describes a legit use case, we can reconsider to revert the removal. Until that, I'm fine with removing them.

https://bugs.python.org/issue41936#msg378002

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

vstinner commented Oct 5, 2020

Ignoring the recursion limit sounds like a nice way to crash Python. There are tons of bugs reports where users report stack overflow crash on a specific recursion limit and a specific workload. This feature sounds really unsafe, so it's good to see it going away ;-)

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka merged commit dcc5421 into python:master Oct 5, 2020
@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka deleted the remove-Py_ALLOW_RECURSION branch October 5, 2020 09:32
shihai1991 added a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2020
* origin/master: (147 commits)
  Fix the attribute names in the docstring of GenericAlias (pythonGH-22594)
  bpo-39337: Add a test case for normalizing of codec names (pythonGH-19069)
  bpo-41557: Update Windows installer to use SQLite 3.33.0 (pythonGH-21960)
  bpo-41976: Fix the fallback to gcc of ctypes.util.find_library when using gcc>9 (pythonGH-22598)
  bpo-41306: Allow scale value to not be rounded (pythonGH-21715)
  bpo-41970: Avoid test failure in test_lib2to3 if the module is already imported (pythonGH-22595)
  bpo-41376: Fix the documentation of `site.getusersitepackages()` (pythonGH-21602)
  Revert "bpo-26680: Incorporate is_integer in all built-in and standard library numeric types (pythonGH-6121)" (pythonGH-22584)
  bpo-41923: PEP 613: Add TypeAlias to typing module (python#22532)
  Fix comment about PyObject_IsTrue. (pythonGH-22343)
  bpo-38605: Make 'from __future__ import annotations' the default (pythonGH-20434)
  bpo-41905: Add abc.update_abstractmethods() (pythonGH-22485)
  bpo-41944: No longer call eval() on content received via HTTP in the UnicodeNames tests (pythonGH-22575)
  bpo-41944: No longer call eval() on content received via HTTP in the CJK codec tests (pythonGH-22566)
  Post 3.10.0a1
  Python 3.10.0a1
  bpo-41584: clarify when the reflected method of a binary arithemtic operator is called (python#22505)
  bpo-41939: Fix test_site.test_license_exists_at_url() (python#22559)
  bpo-41774: Tweak new programming FAQ entry (pythonGH-22562)
  bpo-41936. Remove macros Py_ALLOW_RECURSION/Py_END_ALLOW_RECURSION (pythonGH-22552)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-feature A feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants