Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doc: Fix alphabetical ordering of removeprefix/suffix. #22194

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2020
Merged

Doc: Fix alphabetical ordering of removeprefix/suffix. #22194

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2020

Conversation

benjaminp
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting core review labels Sep 10, 2020
@corona10 corona10 changed the title Fix alphabetical ordering of removeprefix/suffix. Doc: Fix alphabetical ordering of removeprefix/suffix. Sep 10, 2020
@corona10 corona10 merged commit 3304cbd into python:master Sep 10, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @benjaminp for the PR, and @corona10 for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖 I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 3304cbd)

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label Sep 10, 2020
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-22195 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 3304cbd)

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
@benjaminp benjaminp deleted the alpha branch September 11, 2020 00:52
xzy3 pushed a commit to xzy3/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants