Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make codecov config on master the only config used #2041

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2017

Conversation

brettcannon
Copy link
Member

This will allow for centralized management of the Codecov config to prevent skew as well as easier management going forward.

Closes python/core-workflow#81.

@brettcannon brettcannon merged commit 11ffb45 into python:master Jun 9, 2017
@brettcannon brettcannon deleted the master-coverage-config branch June 9, 2017 23:26
brettcannon added a commit to brettcannon/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2017
This will allow for centralized management of the Codecov config to prevent skew as well as easier management going forward.

Closes python/core-workflowGH-81.
(cherry picked from commit 11ffb45)
brettcannon added a commit to brettcannon/cpython that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2017
This will allow for centralized management of the Codecov config to prevent skew as well as easier management going forward.

Closes python/core-workflowGH-81.
(cherry picked from commit 11ffb45)
brettcannon added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2017
…H-2052)

This will allow for centralized management of the Codecov config to prevent skew as well as easier management going forward.

Closes python/core-workflowGH-81.
(cherry picked from commit 11ffb45)
brettcannon added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2017
…H-2053)

This will allow for centralized management of the Codecov config to prevent skew as well as easier management going forward.

Closes python/core-workflowGH-81.
(cherry picked from commit 11ffb45)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants