Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

closes bpo-38712: Add signal.pidfd_send_signal. #17070

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2019
Merged

closes bpo-38712: Add signal.pidfd_send_signal. #17070

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2019

Conversation

benjaminp
Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminp benjaminp commented Nov 6, 2019

This exposes a Linux-specific syscall for sending a signal to a process
identified by a file descriptor rather than a pid.

For simplicity, we don't support the siginfo_t parameter to the syscall. This
parameter allows implementing a pidfd version of rt_sigqueueinfo(2), which
Python also doesn't support.

https://bugs.python.org/issue38712

This exposes a Linux-specific syscall for sending a signal to a process
identified by a file descriptor rather than a pid.

For simplicity, we don't support the siginfo_t parameter to the syscall. This
parameter allows implementing a pidfd version of rt_sigqueueinfo(2), which
Python also doesn't support.

pidfd: int
signalnum: int
siginfo: object = None
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO, we already have a SiginfoType for siginfo.
Is there any reason not to check the type for it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right now this parameter is required to be None.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@benjaminp Got it :)

Copy link
Member

@corona10 corona10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@benjaminp I left a comment on this PR except that PR looks good to me.

@benjaminp benjaminp merged commit 7483451 into python:master Nov 20, 2019
@benjaminp benjaminp deleted the pidfd_send_signal branch November 20, 2019 04:39
jacobneiltaylor pushed a commit to jacobneiltaylor/cpython that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2019
This exposes a Linux-specific syscall for sending a signal to a process
identified by a file descriptor rather than a pid.

For simplicity, we don't support the siginfo_t parameter to the syscall. This
parameter allows implementing a pidfd version of rt_sigqueueinfo(2), which
Python also doesn't support.
shihai1991 pushed a commit to shihai1991/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2020
This exposes a Linux-specific syscall for sending a signal to a process
identified by a file descriptor rather than a pid.

For simplicity, we don't support the siginfo_t parameter to the syscall. This
parameter allows implementing a pidfd version of rt_sigqueueinfo(2), which
Python also doesn't support.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants