Skip to content

Doc: Remove provisional note for asyncio.run() #16310

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2019

Conversation

aeros
Copy link
Contributor

@aeros aeros commented Sep 20, 2019

Based on a comment from @asvetlov #15735 (comment), this removes the provisional note for asyncio.run() in the documentation.

Automerge-Triggered-By: @1st1

@1st1
Copy link
Member

1st1 commented Sep 20, 2019

This shouldn't go into 3.7.

@aeros
Copy link
Contributor Author

aeros commented Sep 20, 2019

@1st1:

This shouldn't go into 3.7.

Oh okay, I wasn't sure if the provisional note warning still applies on the patch it was added. This is actually the first time I've seen one being removed, so I wasn't sure how the process worked.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@aeros167: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 77af229 into python:master Sep 20, 2019
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @aeros167 for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-16311 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

matrixise pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2019
Based on a comment from @asvetlov https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/15735GH-discussion_r323619076, this removes the provisional note for ``asyncio.run()`` in the documentation.

Automerge-Triggered-By: @1st1
(cherry picked from commit 77af229)

Co-authored-by: Kyle Stanley <aeros167@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants