[3.8] bpo-36373: Deprecate explicit loop parameter in all public asyncio APIs [locks] (GH-13920) #15835
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…Is [locks] (pythonGH-13920) This PR deprecate explicit loop parameters in all public asyncio APIs This issues is split to be easier to review. Third step: locks.py https://bugs.python.org/issue36373 (cherry picked from commit 537877d) Co-authored-by: Emmanuel Arias <emmanuelarias30@gmail.com>
miss-islington
requested review from
1st1,
asvetlov and
rhettinger
as code owners
asvetlov
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2019
|
@eamanu: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
|
@eamanu: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
1 similar comment
|
@eamanu: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR deprecate explicit loop parameters in all public asyncio APIs
This issues is split to be easier to review.
Third step: locks.py
https://bugs.python.org/issue36373
(cherry picked from commit 537877d)
Co-authored-by: Emmanuel Arias emmanuelarias30@gmail.com
https://bugs.python.org/issue36373