Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-37936: Remove some .gitignore rules that were intended locally. #15542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2019

Conversation

gnprice
Copy link
Contributor

@gnprice gnprice commented Aug 27, 2019

These appeared in commit c5ae169. The comment on them, as well as
the presence among them of a rule for the .gitignore file itself,
indicate that the author intended these lines to remain only in their
own local working tree -- not to get committed even to their own repo,
let alone merged upstream.

They did nevertheless get committed, because it turns out that Git
takes no notice of what .gitignore says about files that it's already
tracking... for example, this .gitignore file itself.

Give effect to these lines' original intention, by deleting them. :-)

Git tip, for reference: the .git/info/exclude file is a handy way
to do exactly what these lines were originally intended to do. A
related handy file is ~/.config/git/ignore. See gitignore(5),
aka git help ignore, for details.

https://bugs.python.org/issue37936

Automerge-Triggered-By: @zware

These appeared in commit c5ae169.  The comment on them, as well as
the presence among them of a rule for the .gitignore file itself,
indicate that the author intended these lines to remain only in their
own local working tree -- not to get committed even to their own repo,
let alone merged upstream.

They did nevertheless get committed, because it turns out that Git
takes no notice of what .gitignore says about files that it's already
tracking... for example, this .gitignore file itself.

Give effect to these lines' original intention, by deleting them. :-)

Git tip, for reference: the `.git/info/exclude` file is a handy way
to do exactly what these lines were originally intended to do.  A
related handy file is `~/.config/git/ignore`.  See gitignore(5),
aka `git help ignore`, for details.
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @gnprice for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7, 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-15552 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
…ythonGH-15542)

These appeared in commit c5ae169.  The comment on them, as well as
the presence among them of a rule for the .gitignore file itself,
indicate that the author intended these lines to remain only in their
own local working tree -- not to get committed even to their own repo,
let alone merged upstream.

They did nevertheless get committed, because it turns out that Git
takes no notice of what .gitignore says about files that it's already
tracking... for example, this .gitignore file itself.

Give effect to these lines' original intention, by deleting them. :-)

Git tip, for reference: the `.git/info/exclude` file is a handy way
to do exactly what these lines were originally intended to do.  A
related handy file is `~/.config/git/ignore`.  See gitignore(5),
aka `git help ignore`, for details.

https://bugs.python.org/issue37936

Automerge-Triggered-By: @zware
(cherry picked from commit 8c9e9b0)

Co-authored-by: Greg Price <gnprice@gmail.com>
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
…ythonGH-15542)

These appeared in commit c5ae169.  The comment on them, as well as
the presence among them of a rule for the .gitignore file itself,
indicate that the author intended these lines to remain only in their
own local working tree -- not to get committed even to their own repo,
let alone merged upstream.

They did nevertheless get committed, because it turns out that Git
takes no notice of what .gitignore says about files that it's already
tracking... for example, this .gitignore file itself.

Give effect to these lines' original intention, by deleting them. :-)

Git tip, for reference: the `.git/info/exclude` file is a handy way
to do exactly what these lines were originally intended to do.  A
related handy file is `~/.config/git/ignore`.  See gitignore(5),
aka `git help ignore`, for details.

https://bugs.python.org/issue37936

Automerge-Triggered-By: @zware
(cherry picked from commit 8c9e9b0)

Co-authored-by: Greg Price <gnprice@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-15553 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
…H-15542)

These appeared in commit c5ae169.  The comment on them, as well as
the presence among them of a rule for the .gitignore file itself,
indicate that the author intended these lines to remain only in their
own local working tree -- not to get committed even to their own repo,
let alone merged upstream.

They did nevertheless get committed, because it turns out that Git
takes no notice of what .gitignore says about files that it's already
tracking... for example, this .gitignore file itself.

Give effect to these lines' original intention, by deleting them. :-)

Git tip, for reference: the `.git/info/exclude` file is a handy way
to do exactly what these lines were originally intended to do.  A
related handy file is `~/.config/git/ignore`.  See gitignore(5),
aka `git help ignore`, for details.

https://bugs.python.org/issue37936

Automerge-Triggered-By: @zware
(cherry picked from commit 8c9e9b0)

Co-authored-by: Greg Price <gnprice@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2019
…H-15542)

These appeared in commit c5ae169.  The comment on them, as well as
the presence among them of a rule for the .gitignore file itself,
indicate that the author intended these lines to remain only in their
own local working tree -- not to get committed even to their own repo,
let alone merged upstream.

They did nevertheless get committed, because it turns out that Git
takes no notice of what .gitignore says about files that it's already
tracking... for example, this .gitignore file itself.

Give effect to these lines' original intention, by deleting them. :-)

Git tip, for reference: the `.git/info/exclude` file is a handy way
to do exactly what these lines were originally intended to do.  A
related handy file is `~/.config/git/ignore`.  See gitignore(5),
aka `git help ignore`, for details.

https://bugs.python.org/issue37936

Automerge-Triggered-By: @zware
(cherry picked from commit 8c9e9b0)

Co-authored-by: Greg Price <gnprice@gmail.com>
@gnprice gnprice deleted the pr-gitignore-drop-local branch August 27, 2019 19:01
lisroach pushed a commit to lisroach/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2019
…ythonGH-15542)

These appeared in commit c5ae169.  The comment on them, as well as
the presence among them of a rule for the .gitignore file itself,
indicate that the author intended these lines to remain only in their
own local working tree -- not to get committed even to their own repo,
let alone merged upstream.

They did nevertheless get committed, because it turns out that Git
takes no notice of what .gitignore says about files that it's already
tracking... for example, this .gitignore file itself.

Give effect to these lines' original intention, by deleting them. :-)

Git tip, for reference: the `.git/info/exclude` file is a handy way
to do exactly what these lines were originally intended to do.  A
related handy file is `~/.config/git/ignore`.  See gitignore(5),
aka `git help ignore`, for details.



https://bugs.python.org/issue37936



Automerge-Triggered-By: @zware
DinoV pushed a commit to DinoV/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
…ythonGH-15542)

These appeared in commit c5ae169.  The comment on them, as well as
the presence among them of a rule for the .gitignore file itself,
indicate that the author intended these lines to remain only in their
own local working tree -- not to get committed even to their own repo,
let alone merged upstream.

They did nevertheless get committed, because it turns out that Git
takes no notice of what .gitignore says about files that it's already
tracking... for example, this .gitignore file itself.

Give effect to these lines' original intention, by deleting them. :-)

Git tip, for reference: the `.git/info/exclude` file is a handy way
to do exactly what these lines were originally intended to do.  A
related handy file is `~/.config/git/ignore`.  See gitignore(5),
aka `git help ignore`, for details.



https://bugs.python.org/issue37936



Automerge-Triggered-By: @zware
websurfer5 pushed a commit to websurfer5/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2020
…ythonGH-15542)

These appeared in commit c5ae169.  The comment on them, as well as
the presence among them of a rule for the .gitignore file itself,
indicate that the author intended these lines to remain only in their
own local working tree -- not to get committed even to their own repo,
let alone merged upstream.

They did nevertheless get committed, because it turns out that Git
takes no notice of what .gitignore says about files that it's already
tracking... for example, this .gitignore file itself.

Give effect to these lines' original intention, by deleting them. :-)

Git tip, for reference: the `.git/info/exclude` file is a handy way
to do exactly what these lines were originally intended to do.  A
related handy file is `~/.config/git/ignore`.  See gitignore(5),
aka `git help ignore`, for details.



https://bugs.python.org/issue37936



Automerge-Triggered-By: @zware
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants