-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-131296: fix clang-cl warnings on Windows in blake2module.c #131299
Conversation
@@ -92,10 +92,10 @@ void detect_cpu_features(cpu_flags *flags) { | |||
ebx7 = info7[1]; | |||
ecx7 = info7[2]; | |||
edx7 = info7[3]; | |||
#else | |||
#endif | |||
(void) eax1; (void) ebx1; (void) ecx1; (void) edx1; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LOL... definitely fighting against the compiler's idea of best practices here using useless no-op statements as a way to work around it. i wish we could disable a specific warning for a whole block of code. i feel like a future compiler will notice that these are useless and stop considering them a "use".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was just the least minimal change to silence the warning :)
Luckily, I think we'll never have to fear that this will ever need a change: that (void)
pattern is adapted by all known compilers for ages - and I think this will stay.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ideally, we would have used (void) ...
in the elif
branch but it would be an overkill for foolish consistency.
(void) eax1; (void) ebx1; (void) ecx1; (void) edx1; | ||
(void) eax7; (void) ebx7; (void) ecx7; (void) edx7; | ||
#endif | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you remove the double blank lines L98/L99 please? TiA
Oh it was merged :') |
…ython#131299) work around unimportant clang-cl warnings in blake2module.c
Fix
we see them two (non-PGO) or three times, because the
_freeze_module
compiles blake2module.c, too.I think this is a skip news.