Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

better __init__.py explanation in tutorial #12763

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 11, 2019
Merged

Conversation

methane
Copy link
Member

@methane methane commented Apr 10, 2019

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

When you're done making the requested changes, leave the comment: I have made the requested changes; please review again.

Co-Authored-By: methane <songofacandy@gmail.com>
@methane methane merged commit 5410d3d into python:master Apr 11, 2019
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

@methane: Please replace # with GH- in the commit message next time. Thanks!

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @methane for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@methane methane deleted the tut-package branch April 11, 2019 06:10
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2019
* better __init__.py explanation in tutorial

* Update Doc/tutorial/modules.rst

Co-Authored-By: methane <songofacandy@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5410d3d)

Co-authored-by: Inada Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-12773 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2019
* better __init__.py explanation in tutorial

* Update Doc/tutorial/modules.rst

Co-Authored-By: methane <songofacandy@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5410d3d)

Co-authored-by: Inada Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants