-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Doc: Be explicit that Pathlib resolve was strict before 3.6. #11316
Doc: Be explicit that Pathlib resolve was strict before 3.6. #11316
Conversation
LGTM. The wording conveys your meaning, so I think it's fine. If you wanted to be a little more formal, you can use |
LGTM but I also like @csabella suggestion, although I am fine either way :) |
Thanks @JulienPalard for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7. |
GH-13190 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch. |
(cherry picked from commit 1d4b160) Co-authored-by: Julien Palard <julien@palard.fr>
From: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2018-December/038529.html
Not sure about the wording, can a native-english proofread this? :)