gh-102512: Fix threading after os.fork() called from a foreign thread #102517
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
threading._shutdown() relies on _main_thread having _tstate_lock not None (there is assert for that). When fork is called from a foreign thread (aka DummyThread), it gets promoted to main thread, but remains very simplistic DummyThread. Especially, nobody initializes its _tstate_lock. threading._after_fork() handles the case of current thread not being in _active dict at all (by creating new MainThread object), but it doesn't handle the case of having DummyThread there already.
Fix this by initializing
_tstate_lock
in a DummyThread too.See linked issue for more details, including reproducer.
The PR includes also regression test
os.fork()
called from DummyThread confuses threading shutdown logic #102512