Skip to content

fix: Invalid concurrent-processing return type #137

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024

Conversation

caffeine-addictt
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • Refactor
  • Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Optimization
  • Breaking Change
  • Documentation Update

Description

  • Fix invalid return type with ConcurrentProcessing

Related Tickets & Documents

QA Instructions, Screenshots, Recordings

Please replace this line with instructions on how to test your changes, a note
on the devices and browsers this has been tested on, as well as any relevant
images for UI changes.

Added/updated tests?

We encourage you to keep the code coverage percentage at 80% and above.

  • Yes
  • No, and this is why: Not needed
  • I need help with writing tests

[optional] Are there any post deployment tasks we need to perform?

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have incremented the version according to semantic versioning.
  • I have updated the changelog accordingly.

@caffeine-addictt caffeine-addictt added the Type: Bug Something isn't working as expected. label Jul 6, 2024
@caffeine-addictt caffeine-addictt self-assigned this Jul 6, 2024
@caffeine-addictt caffeine-addictt merged commit 6a86736 into main Jul 6, 2024
38 checks passed
@caffeine-addictt caffeine-addictt deleted the fix/concurrent-return-type branch July 6, 2024 18:04
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Documentation An issue/change with the documentation. label Jul 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation An issue/change with the documentation. Type: Bug Something isn't working as expected.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Concurrent Processing return type marked as List[Data_T] instead of List[Target_T]
1 participant