You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 27, 2021. It is now read-only.
When I was doing my uwsgi role I kind of tried to make it so it tries to get config from django roles, and failed miserably. But it would really be nice to have generic solutions for common deployment patterns like:
Django + uWSGI + Nginxc
Djabng + WSGI + apache
But I have no idea how to implement it so it really is usable for other people than me.
Some loose thoughts:
Either pass context variables containing Django Settings such as root dir, wsgi module and so on, and make uWSGI read this context (it would also set own context wariables).
Make Django, uWSGI, Nginx totally separate, and just create thin DjangoUwsgiNginx role that would do the integration.
Second idea is nicer because there is no hidden dependencies in context, first is nicer beceuse we have no interdependent role.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this may have something to do with the Bundles we've been discussing before, which would be responsible for setting up specific applications and their requirements, such as WordpressBundle, for example. This would make total sense as a Bundle, to me, but we haven't specified yet what would be the boundary between bundles and roles.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
When I was doing my uwsgi role I kind of tried to make it so it tries to get config from django roles, and failed miserably. But it would really be nice to have generic solutions for common deployment patterns like:
But I have no idea how to implement it so it really is usable for other people than me.
Some loose thoughts:
Second idea is nicer because there is no hidden dependencies in context, first is nicer beceuse we have no interdependent role.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: