Update dependencies, vendored source and generated source

[abn]

Closes: #9
Resolves: #8

[omikader]

Awesome, thanks @abn! I had a couple more questions before we go and make a new release. Let me know what you think:

1. I don't plan on using the _legacy stubs, but do you also wish to update the _legacy bindings similar to Upgrade betterproto to 2.0.0b3 and make update #9 ?
2. We should add a py.typed file to this package so that dependent projects that use mypy also get the benefits of the betterproto typehints. See PEP561 for more details. I can also make this PR.
3. Is there a way for betterproto to automatically link this project when a raw .proto file has a gnmi import? Take this .proto file for example. When running it through betterproto, the output is this file which is looking for a local implementation. Our solution so far is to manually edit the file after autogenerating, but I was wondering if there was a better option.

Let me know what you think and thanks for the awesome project!

[abn]

Awesome, thanks @abn! I had a couple more questions before we go and make a new release. Let me know what you think:

1. I don't plan on using the _legacy stubs, but do you also wish to update the _legacy bindings similar to Upgrade betterproto to 2.0.0b3 and make update #9 ?

The changes were non-functional. The changes did not come through because pycharm decided to optimise import prior to commit 🤦. It has been fixed now and PR updated.

2. We should add a py.typed file to this package so that dependent projects that use mypy also get the benefits of the betterproto typehints. See PEP561 for more details. I can also make this PR.

I would definitely welcome a PR for this. Definitely not against it.

3. Is there a way for betterproto to automatically link this project when a raw .proto file has a gnmi import? Take this .proto file for example. When running it through betterproto, the output is this file which is looking for a local implementation. Our solution so far is to manually edit the file after autogenerating, but I was wondering if there was a better option.

I am not sure at present. Maybe let's start a discussion (https://github.com/python-gnxi/python-gnmi-proto/discussions)

[omikader]

Cool, just pushed #15. I'll start the discussion soon.