Skip to content

perform_sequence: a higher-level, more debuggable way to perform with a SequenceDispatcher#69

Merged
radix merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
perform-sequence
Aug 25, 2015
Merged

perform_sequence: a higher-level, more debuggable way to perform with a SequenceDispatcher#69
radix merged 8 commits into
masterfrom
perform-sequence

Conversation

@radix
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@radix radix commented Aug 25, 2015

The main benefit over SequenceDispatcher is:

  • you don't need the with, since it performs the effect for you
  • it generates a log of intents that were performed (or failed to be performed). omg!

radix added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2015
perform_sequence: a higher-level, more debuggable way to perform with a SequenceDispatcher
@radix radix merged commit 12ff4dd into master Aug 25, 2015
@radix radix deleted the perform-sequence branch August 25, 2015 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant