Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Preparing for v1.4.0-release #447

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

Preparing for v1.4.0-release #447

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

tobixen
Copy link
Member

@tobixen tobixen commented Nov 1, 2024

This "pull request" is intended to be a collection of commits needed for doing a 1.4.0-release - fixes and workarounds to the test code to get it to work on as many calendar servers as possible, CHANGELOG entry, comments, documentation, etc.

To get tests passing on Zimbra now, I've introduced code that ensures all objects added to a calendar has the mandatory fields PRODID, VERSION, UID, DTSTAMP. This may be considered an enhancement more than a bugfix. All other fixes so far are either noop or only relevant for tests.

* stubbed work with ratelimiting (unsuccessful attempt on handling 429 from ecloud.global).
* Noop: comments on the purelymail compatibility matrix.
DTSTAMP, UID, PRODID and VERSION are mandatory fields in the icalendar object.  The client has been enforcing this a bit arbitrary.  This commit will ensure they are always populated when sending ical data to the server.

Arguably this is a new feature - but it's also sort of a bugfix since the earlier versions would populate those fields sometmes but not always.
This commit allows the client to specify if expansion of recurrent
events should happen on the server side or the client side.

I'm not happy with the interface, so there is already a deprecation
notice in the comments that this may be changed in verson 2.0.
@tobixen tobixen merged commit f620f59 into master Nov 5, 2024
8 checks passed
@tobixen tobixen deleted the minor_stuff branch November 5, 2024 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant