Skip to content

chore: fix some more CI stuff #2383

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025
Merged

chore: fix some more CI stuff #2383

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

jayantk
Copy link
Contributor

@jayantk jayantk commented Feb 16, 2025

CI on main is failing for two different reasons. (1) the Forge version wasn't pinned for the ethereum contract, and (2) the Cargo.lock file wasn't updated properly after a recent merge. The root cause of the 2nd item is that pre-commit is being run on a subset of files on PRs, which causes it to succeed on PRs then fail on main. I removed this option in the pre-commit check. This means pre-commit will run on all files, which will take longer, though it shouldn't be too long since I already added caching for all the Rust build stuff.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 16, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 16, 2025 8:46pm
proposals ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 16, 2025 8:46pm
staking ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 16, 2025 8:46pm
3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
component-library ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 16, 2025 8:46pm
entropy-debugger ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 16, 2025 8:46pm
insights ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 16, 2025 8:46pm

@jayantk jayantk merged commit bb7fa71 into main Feb 17, 2025
11 checks passed
@jayantk jayantk deleted the ci1 branch February 17, 2025 05:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants