Skip to content

Conversation

@madhur-tandon
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@WebReflection
Copy link

the MR looks good but is there any reason no description is presented? I've no idea what I am approving otherwise, thanks for any sort of clarification, this header is hostile for mobile data too so I'd love to have at least a hint around why this is needed.

Copy link
Contributor

@FabioRosado FabioRosado left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@madhur-tandon Do you remember why we need this? We can now merge stuff

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3946708) 96.23% compared to head (e503140) 96.23%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #133   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.23%   96.23%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         292      292           
=======================================
  Hits          281      281           
  Misses         11       11           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@FabioRosado FabioRosado merged commit edb062c into main Feb 15, 2024
@FabioRosado FabioRosado deleted the no-cache-header branch February 15, 2024 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants