Skip to content

Remove deprecated sample_posterior_predictive_w #7179

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

aloctavodia
Copy link
Member

@aloctavodia aloctavodia commented Feb 29, 2024


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pymc--7179.org.readthedocs.build/en/7179/

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.24%. Comparing base (6252d2e) to head (ee1ab73).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7179   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.23%   92.24%           
=======================================
  Files         100      100           
  Lines       16889    16887    -2     
=======================================
- Hits        15578    15577    -1     
+ Misses       1311     1310    -1     
Files Coverage Δ
pymc/sampling/forward.py 95.90% <ø> (+0.41%) ⬆️

@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 changed the title Remove sample_posterior_predictive_w, previously deprecated Remove deprecated sample_posterior_predictive_w Feb 29, 2024
@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 added maintenance major Include in major changes release notes section labels Feb 29, 2024
@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 merged commit 6c6fd13 into pymc-devs:main Feb 29, 2024
@ricardoV94
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the dusting @aloctavodia

@aloctavodia aloctavodia deleted the d_sspw branch February 29, 2024 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
maintenance major Include in major changes release notes section
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants