Skip to content

Conversation

DanielNoord
Copy link
Collaborator

@DanielNoord DanielNoord commented Oct 6, 2021

Steps

  • For new features or bug fixes, add a ChangeLog entry describing what your PR does.
  • Write a good description on what the PR does.

Description

This is based on @cdce8p's suggestion. This also includes the test files he came up with.

I think we should also reconsider the tests that are currently here. Also the one for #1186. I don't think we actually reached consensus in that issue about whether we are fully testing everything we want. It seems we're missing some knowledge about how astroid resources are tested.

I did test this with pylint-dev/pylint#5059 and this suggestion works.

Type of Changes

Type
🐛 Bug fix

Related Issue

This closes #1200

@DanielNoord DanielNoord added Regression pylint-tested PRs that don't cause major regressions with pylint labels Oct 6, 2021
@DanielNoord DanielNoord added this to the 2.8.1 milestone Oct 6, 2021
@DanielNoord DanielNoord marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2021 15:28
Copy link
Member

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit 47985f3 into pylint-dev:main Oct 6, 2021
@DanielNoord DanielNoord deleted the namespace-regression branch October 6, 2021 20:01
@cdce8p
Copy link
Member

cdce8p commented Oct 6, 2021

Thanks @DanielNoord 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pylint-tested PRs that don't cause major regressions with pylint Regression
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression for #1186
3 participants