Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Aug 2, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added integration tests for Slurm and Flux job schedulers to verify job submission and status tracking.
  • Tests
    • Introduced automated test coverage for Slurm and Flux integration in the continuous integration pipeline.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 2, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jan-janssen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 689784c and ad58618.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/pipeline.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_flux.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_slurm_integration.py (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

Two new integration test jobs for Slurm and Flux were added to the GitHub Actions pipeline. Corresponding Python unittest modules were introduced to verify job submission and status tracking through the QueueAdapter interface for both schedulers. The tests are conditionally skipped if the required environment or executables are not available.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
CI Workflow Integration Tests
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml
Added unittest_slurm and unittest_flux jobs to CI pipeline for Slurm and Flux integration testing.
Flux Integration Test
tests/test_flux_integration.py
New unittest module for Flux: submits a job, checks status transitions, skips if FLUX_URI is missing.
Slurm Integration Test
tests/test_slurm_integration.py
New unittest module for Slurm: submits a job, checks status transitions, skips if srun is unavailable.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Slurm Integration Test Flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant Tester as TestSlurm (unittest)
    participant Adapter as QueueAdapter (slurm)
    participant Slurm as Slurm Scheduler

    Tester->>Adapter: submit_job("sleep 1")
    Adapter->>Slurm: Submit job
    Slurm-->>Adapter: Job ID
    Adapter-->>Tester: Job ID

    Tester->>Adapter: get_status(job_id)
    Adapter->>Slurm: Query status
    Slurm-->>Adapter: "running"/"pending"
    Adapter-->>Tester: Status

    Tester->>Tester: Wait 2 seconds

    Tester->>Adapter: get_status(job_id)
    Adapter->>Slurm: Query status
    Slurm-->>Adapter: "finished"
    Adapter-->>Tester: Status
Loading

Flux Integration Test Flow

sequenceDiagram
    participant Tester as TestFlux (unittest)
    participant Adapter as QueueAdapter (flux)
    participant Flux as Flux Scheduler

    Tester->>Adapter: submit_job("sleep 1")
    Adapter->>Flux: Submit job
    Flux-->>Adapter: Job ID
    Adapter-->>Tester: Job ID

    Tester->>Adapter: get_status(job_id)
    Adapter->>Flux: Query status
    Flux-->>Adapter: "running"/"pending"
    Adapter-->>Tester: Status

    Tester->>Tester: Wait 2 seconds

    Tester->>Adapter: get_status(job_id)
    Adapter->>Flux: Query status
    Flux-->>Adapter: "finished"
    Adapter-->>Tester: Status
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

🐇
In CI’s warren, new tunnels appear,
Slurm and Flux now tested here!
Jobs submitted, statuses checked,
Integration’s future—bright and direct.
With every hop, our coverage grows,
A rabbit’s delight as the pipeline flows!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch integration

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
tests/test_slurm_integration.py (2)

6-9: Consider using ternary operator for cleaner code.

The current if-else block can be simplified using a ternary operator as suggested by the static analysis tool.

-if shutil.which("srun") is not None:
-    skip_slurm_test = False
-else:
-    skip_slurm_test = True
+skip_slurm_test = shutil.which("srun") is None

13-13: Fix typo in skip message.

There's a typo "SLRUM" instead of "SLURM" in the skip message.

-    skip_slurm_test, "SLRUM is not installed, so the slurm tests are skipped.",
+    skip_slurm_test, "SLURM is not installed, so the slurm tests are skipped.",
tests/test_flux_integration.py (1)

6-10: Simplify environment check logic.

The try-catch block is unnecessary since accessing os.environ doesn't raise ImportError. Also, the pmi variable is assigned but never used.

-try:
-    skip_flux_test = "FLUX_URI" not in os.environ
-    pmi = os.environ.get("EXECUTORLIB_PMIX", None)
-except ImportError:
-    skip_flux_test = True
+skip_flux_test = "FLUX_URI" not in os.environ
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac5ad0f and 689784c.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/pipeline.yml (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_flux_integration.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_slurm_integration.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
tests/test_flux_integration.py (1)
pysqa/queueadapter.py (1)
  • QueueAdapter (13-385)
tests/test_slurm_integration.py (1)
pysqa/queueadapter.py (1)
  • QueueAdapter (13-385)
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)
tests/test_slurm_integration.py

6-9: Use ternary operator skip_slurm_test = False if shutil.which("srun") is not None else True instead of if-else-block

Replace if-else-block with skip_slurm_test = False if shutil.which("srun") is not None else True

(SIM108)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_matrix (windows-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: unittest_slurm
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml (2)

224-256: SLURM integration job setup looks good.

The job configuration properly sets up SLURM environment with MySQL service, uses appropriate timeouts, and validates SLURM functionality before running tests.


257-278: Flux integration job setup looks good.

The job correctly installs flux-core and runs tests within a Flux session using flux start.

flux start python -m unittest test_flux_integration.py
autobot:
needs: [unittest_old, unittest_matrix, pip_check, notebooks, minimal, coverage]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add new integration jobs to autobot dependencies.

The new integration test jobs should be included in the autobot dependencies to ensure they gate automated merges for bot PRs.

-    needs: [unittest_old, unittest_matrix, pip_check, notebooks, minimal, coverage]
+    needs: [unittest_old, unittest_matrix, pip_check, notebooks, minimal, coverage, unittest_slurm, unittest_flux]
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
needs: [unittest_old, unittest_matrix, pip_check, notebooks, minimal, coverage]
needs: [unittest_old, unittest_matrix, pip_check, notebooks, minimal, coverage, unittest_slurm, unittest_flux]
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .github/workflows/pipeline.yml at line 280, the 'needs' array for the autobot
job is missing the new integration test jobs. Add the new integration test job
names to the 'needs' list to ensure these tests are completed before the autobot
job runs, properly gating automated merges for bot PRs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.26%. Comparing base (8518cd7) to head (ad58618).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #432   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.26%   81.26%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines         966      966           
=======================================
  Hits          785      785           
  Misses        181      181           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit 966b56f into main Aug 2, 2025
23 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the integration branch August 2, 2025 05:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants