Format Python code with ruff format instead of black

[cclauss]

Failing tests are fixed in:

• Remove lint logic from setup.py #2796

We want all tools run in pre-commit to be as fast as possible to enhance contributor productivity.

Let's consider formatting Python code with a highly compatible yet much faster formatter than Black.

https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/#philosophy

The formatter is designed as a drop-in replacement for Black, but with an excessive focus on performance and direct integration with Ruff. Given Black's popularity within the Python ecosystem, targeting Black compatibility ensures that formatter adoption is minimally disruptive for the vast majority of projects.

From: Known Deviations from Black

• https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/black/#hex-codes-and-unicode-sequences
• https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/black/#module-docstrings

[oddbookworm]

Personally, I've been using ruff more lately, so I'm not against switching to it over black. But, I consider #2796 a blocker for this pull because of the failing lint check. I don't want every commit/pull to have a failing lint check while we wait on a fix pull to be merged.

I also would like to see opinions from the pygame-ce steering council.

[oddbookworm]

@cclauss I haven't seen you on the pygame community discord server, where a lot of contribution discussions happen. If you'd like to join in those conversations, you can join the server at https://discord.gg/pygame

[MyreMylar]

OK, this looks good to me.

AFAICT, for our purposes ruff is just black (with a couple of super minor formatting differences) that will run faster because the formatting engine is re-written in a native code language (Rust in this case) rather than pure python.

No good reason not to have our formatter run faster (other than my general grumpy dislike of change.)

[cclauss]

a couple of super minor formatting differences

https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/#black-compatibility

[cclauss]

Please re-run the failing test.

[oddbookworm]

LGTM!

[cclauss]

Do we need more approvals?

[damusss]

@cclauss Don't think so, I think someone just need to press some magical merge button

[cclauss]

single-line-implicit-string-concatenation (ISC001)

• https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/single-line-implicit-string-concatenation/

[ankith26]

LGTM, thanks for the PR 🎉