Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

log detail miss between jira-3.2.0 and jira-3.4.1 #1606

Open
2 of 4 tasks
lishoujun opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
2 of 4 tasks

log detail miss between jira-3.2.0 and jira-3.4.1 #1606

lishoujun opened this issue Feb 6, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
bug good first issue New contributors welcome !

Comments

@lishoujun
Copy link
Contributor

Bug summary

Hi!
This week I update jira lib from 3.2.0 to 3.4.1, after this update, when create issue failed, there is no enough log detail

in 3.2.0

2023-02-06 14:22:40,311 - DEBUG - 4410643968 - https://xxxx.atlassian.net:443 "GET /rest/api/2/project/xxx HTTP/1.1" 200 None
2023-02-06 14:22:40,839 - DEBUG - 4410643968 - https://xxx.atlassian.net:443 "POST /rest/api/2/issue HTTP/1.1" 400 None
The issue type selected is invalid.

in 3.4.1

2023-02-06 14:08:30,833 - DEBUG - 4556871168 - https://xxx.atlassian.net:443 "GET /rest/api/2/project/xxx HTTP/1.1" 200 None
2023-02-06 14:08:31,259 - DEBUG - 4556871168 - https://xxx.atlassian.net:443 "POST /rest/api/2/issue HTTP/1.1" 400 None

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Jira Instance type

Jira Cloud (Hosted by Atlassian)

Jira instance version

NONE

jira-python version

3.4.1

Python Interpreter version

3.10.5

Which operating systems have you used?

  • Linux
  • macOS
  • Windows

Reproduction steps

# 1. Given a Jira client instance
jira: JIRA
# 2. When I call the function with argument required field missing
jira.create_issue(x)
# 3.  400 but no log detail

Stack trace

2023-02-06 14:08:30,833 - DEBUG - 4556871168 - https://xxx.atlassian.net:443 "GET /rest/api/2/project/xxx HTTP/1.1" 200 None
2023-02-06 14:08:31,259 - DEBUG - 4556871168 - https://xxx.atlassian.net:443 "POST /rest/api/2/issue HTTP/1.1" 400 None

Expected behaviour

print the error detail

Additional Context

No response

@adehad adehad added bug good first issue New contributors welcome ! labels Feb 8, 2023
@adehad
Copy link
Contributor

adehad commented Mar 11, 2023

I was somewhat able to reproduce this error

I used the following:

jira: JIRA

try:
    issue = jira.create_issue(
        summary="Test issue created",
        project=jira.projects()[0].key,
        issuetype={"name": "BadIssueType"},
        description="foo description",
    )
except Exception as e:
    print("String print:" + str(e)) # empty
    print(e.text) # '{"errorMessages":[],"errors":{"issuetype":"Specify an issue type"}}'
    # raise e # Raises traceback as expected

This is the exception raised:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
  File "C:\Users\adeha\Documents\GitHub\jira\jira\client.py", line 1521, in create_issue
    r = self._session.post(url, data=json.dumps(data))
  File "C:\Users\adeha\Documents\GitHub\jira\.tox\py310\lib\site-packages\requests\sessions.py", line 635, in post
    return self.request("POST", url, data=data, json=json, **kwargs)
  File "C:\Users\adeha\Documents\GitHub\jira\jira\resilientsession.py", line 241, in request
    elif raise_on_error(response, **processed_kwargs):
  File "C:\Users\adeha\Documents\GitHub\jira\jira\resilientsession.py", line 69, in raise_on_error
    raise JIRAError(
jira.exceptions.JIRAError: JiraError HTTP 400 url: https://pycontribs.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/issue
	
	response headers = { ... }
	response text = {"errorMessages":[],"errors":{"issuetype":"Specify an issue type"}}

Therefore the issue lies in in the parser for error messages, where we are using an elseif condition and therefore missing the errors key after parsing the first empty list in errorMessages.

I think the best option is to not use an else if condition and instead keep appending error messages as we go through the returned dictionary. Although perhaps we don't need to try anything fancy and simply return the response as it is, perhaps a simple json.dumps(e.text, indent=4) or equivalent may suffice to make it readable.

@adehad
Copy link
Contributor

adehad commented Mar 11, 2023

@studioj any thoughts?

@Wonskcalb
Copy link

We had the same issue here at my company trying out the new version. I agree that removing the else will resolve this.

Complementary to this change, I'd suggest combining the conditions with a value check on the repository, to also use python truthiness check and validate that even if the key exist, it should have an actual value (sorry, I couldn't resist adding some walrus operators to make things more pythonic 😅 )

    if "message" in resp_data:
        # ...
    elif resp_errors := resp_data.get("errorMessage", [])
        # ...
    elif resp_errors := resp_data.get("errorMessages", []):
        # ...
    elif resp_errors := resp_data.get("errors", []):
        # ...

    return parsed_errors

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug good first issue New contributors welcome !
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants