Skip to content

ZodiPy #161

Closed
Closed
ZodiPy#161
@MetinSa

Description

@MetinSa

Submitting Author: Metin San (@MetinSa)
All current maintainers: (@MetinSa, @dncnwtts, @hermda02)
Package Name: ZodiPy
One-Line Description of Package: Zodiacal emission simulations in timestreams or HEALPix for solar system observers.
Repository Link: https://github.com/Cosmoglobe/zodipy
Version submitted: v.0.8.5
EiC: @isabelizimm
Editor: @dhomeier
Reviewer 1: @pllim
Reviewer 2: @lpsinger
Archive: DOI
JOSS DOI: DOI
Version accepted: v.0.9.2
Date accepted (month/day/year): 04/21/2024


Code of Conduct & Commitment to Maintain Package

Description

ZodiPy is a new Python tool for modelling the zodiacal emission seen by an arbitrary Solar System observer, which can be used for removal of both thermal emission and scattered sunlight from interplanetary dust in astrophysical data. One of our main goals with ZodiPy is to make zodiacal emission simulations more accessible by providing the community with a simple Python interface to existing models. We recently published a paper on ZodiPy (which has also been accepted to A&A) where we describe in more detail modelling of zodiacal emission and the approach taken by ZodiPy.

ZodiPy uses Astropy both in the public API and internally. When using one of the methods provided to simulate the zodiacal emission, the user needs to use Quantity and Time types in input arguments such as frequency/wavelength, angles on the sky, and the time of observation. Internally, the Time object is used to compute the heliocentric ecliptic position of the Earth and the observer with the SkyCoord and other functionality in astropy.coordinates.

Scope

  • Please indicate which category or categories.
    Check out our package scope page to learn more about our
    scope. (If you are unsure of which category you fit, we suggest you make a pre-submission inquiry):

    • Data retrieval
    • Data extraction
    • Data processing/munging
    • Data deposition
    • Data validation and testing
    • Data visualization1
    • Workflow automation
    • Citation management and bibliometrics
    • Scientific software wrappers
    • Database interoperability

ZodiPy was already proposed and reviewed as an Astropy Affiliated package before the recent partnership between Astropy and pyOpenSci in APE22, so I am resubmitting the proposal as is here.

Domain Specific

  • Geospatial
  • Education

Community Partnerships

If your package is associated with an
existing community please check below:

  • For all submissions, explain how the and why the package falls under the categories you indicated above. In your explanation, please address the following points (briefly, 1-2 sentences for each):

    • Who is the target audience and what are scientific applications of this package?

      • The target audience is astronomers and cosmologists who work with sky observations all the way from the optical to CMB-frequencies. The scientific application of the this package is to provide the astronomer with and open source tool to create simulated timestreams, snapshots, or maps of the zodiacal light as seen from earth or any other arbitrary solar system observer. This allows existing experiments with data contaminated by zodiacal light to model and remove the light from their data, and future experiments can, and some already has (Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope) use ZodiPy to make forecasts and simulations.
    • Are there other Python packages that accomplish the same thing? If so, how does yours differ?

      • There exists a few zodiacal light tools but these are all experiment specific and can only be used to model the zodiacal light that was observed in their data. ZodiPy is as far as i know the only Python package that allows for arbitrary solar system observers to make zodiacal light simulations. ZodiPy is also extendible and can easily be updated with new improvements to zodiacal light models and even used to fit new models.
    • If you made a pre-submission enquiry, please paste the link to the corresponding issue, forum post, or other discussion, or @tag the editor you contacted:

Technical checks

For details about the pyOpenSci packaging requirements, see our packaging guide. Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:

  • does not violate the Terms of Service of any service it interacts with.
  • uses an OSI approved license.
  • contains a README with instructions for installing the development version.
  • includes documentation with examples for all functions.
  • contains a tutorial with examples of its essential functions and uses.
  • has a test suite.
  • has continuous integration setup, such as GitHub Actions CircleCI, and/or others.

Publication Options

JOSS Checks
  • The package has an obvious research application according to JOSS's definition in their submission requirements. Be aware that completing the pyOpenSci review process does not guarantee acceptance to JOSS. Be sure to read their submission requirements (linked above) if you are interested in submitting to JOSS.
  • The package is not a "minor utility" as defined by JOSS's submission requirements: "Minor ‘utility’ packages, including ‘thin’ API clients, are not acceptable." pyOpenSci welcomes these packages under "Data Retrieval", but JOSS has slightly different criteria.
  • The package contains a paper.md matching JOSS's requirements with a high-level description in the package root or in inst/.
  • The package is deposited in a long-term repository with the DOI:

Note: JOSS accepts our review as theirs. You will NOT need to go through another full review. JOSS will only review your paper.md file. Be sure to link to this pyOpenSci issue when a JOSS issue is opened for your package. Also be sure to tell the JOSS editor that this is a pyOpenSci reviewed package once you reach this step.

Are you OK with Reviewers Submitting Issues and/or pull requests to your Repo Directly?

This option will allow reviewers to open smaller issues that can then be linked to PR's rather than submitting a more dense text based review. It will also allow you to demonstrate addressing the issue via PR links.

  • Yes I am OK with reviewers submitting requested changes as issues to my repo. Reviewers will then link to the issues in their submitted review.

Confirm each of the following by checking the box.

  • I have read the author guide.
  • I expect to maintain this package for at least 2 years and can help find a replacement for the maintainer (team) if needed.

Please fill out our survey

P.S. Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment here

Editor and Review Templates

The editor template can be found here.

The review template can be found here.

Footnotes

  1. Please fill out a pre-submission inquiry before submitting a data visualization package.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

Status

joss-accepted

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions