Description
ok yes this is confusing isn't it. we should actually link over to the author checks rather than have a requirements list embedded here
this is what we have now - https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/software-peer-review-guide/author-guide.html#does-your-package-meet-packaging-requirements but i see how it's going to confuse readers.
And THIS represents the initial checks:
I also just found a BROKEN LINK in the authors guide to the EIC checklist. i wonder how we missed that!
@NickleDave pinging you and @arianesasso on this one. we need to better coordinate between the two guides to ensure authors know what the checks are. i think specific checklists belong in the author guide as include files. then we can LINK to more information here to help them implement those checks. but it will require some thought about cross referencing. I also noticed a link is broken to EIC checks in the author guide!
Originally posted by @lwasser in #19 (comment)
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Status