Skip to content

Conversation

@stefan6419846
Copy link
Collaborator

This fixes the first part of #3549, where #3124 was incorrect without me noticing this. To avoid this in the future, add a more complex test actually covering the exact form values and checking the value of the /V key for its type.

This fixes the first part of py-pdf#3549, where py-pdf#3124 was incorrect without me
noticing this. To avoid this in the future, add a more complex test
actually covering the exact form values and checking the value of the
`/V` key for its type.
@stefan6419846 stefan6419846 marked this pull request as draft December 31, 2025 12:03
@stefan6419846 stefan6419846 added the needs-discussion The PR/issue needs more discussion before we can continue label Jan 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-discussion The PR/issue needs more discussion before we can continue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant