Skip to content

Conversation

@j-t-1
Copy link
Contributor

@j-t-1 j-t-1 commented Aug 7, 2024

More self-documenting and consistent with str_.

More self-documenting and consistent with str_.
@j-t-1 j-t-1 mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2024
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.16%. Comparing base (5abd590) to head (08d7566).
Report is 73 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2791   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.16%   95.16%           
=======================================
  Files          51       51           
  Lines        8545     8545           
  Branches     1703     1703           
=======================================
  Hits         8132     8132           
  Misses        261      261           
  Partials      152      152           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

("😀😃", "😀😃".encode()),
],
)
def test_b(input_str: str, expected: bytes):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should update the test name as well.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call.

@pubpub-zz
Copy link
Collaborator

please standby on b_ : I would like first to finish my analysis. This may introduce some slight performance improvements

j-t-1 added 2 commits August 7, 2024 14:57
More self-documenting and consistent with str_.
pubpub-zz added a commit to pubpub-zz/pypdf that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
@j-t-1 j-t-1 deleted the bytes_ branch September 5, 2024 15:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants