-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Adding in AWS tests using providertest framework #669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
fddbcd4 to
f774f9d
Compare
|
You can use commands like |
f774f9d to
738058f
Compare
720c14b to
18e82c3
Compare
8fd7fbb to
da27e74
Compare
|
Claude finished @rshade's task —— View job Pull Request Review: AWS EKS Testing FrameworkI've completed a comprehensive review of this PR that introduces AWS EKS testing infrastructure and GitHub Actions workflow improvements. Here's my detailed analysis: Review Checklist:
🟢 Strengths and Best Practices1. Excellent Test Framework Architecture
2. Production-Ready Configuration Management
3. Security Improvements
🟡 Areas for Improvement1. GitHub Actions Workflow Security# In .github/workflows/main.yml:15
- uses: actions/checkout@ff7abcd0c3c05ccf6adc123a8cd1fd4fb30fb493 # v4Issue: This still uses a commit SHA instead of the updated version tag pattern. Should be: - uses: actions/checkout@v42. AWS Region Configuration// In tests/aws_eks_ts_test.go:33
config := map[string]string{
"aws:region": "us-east-1",
}Recommendation: Consider making the AWS region configurable via environment variable to support multi-region testing and align with the ca-central-1 requirement mentioned in CLAUDE.md. 3. Test Timeout and Resource Limits# In .github/workflows/test-aws-eks.yml:27
timeout-minutes: 120Consideration: 120 minutes may be insufficient for the full 8-stage EKS deployment. Based on CLAUDE.md, EKS tests typically take ~2 hours. Consider increasing to 150 minutes to account for potential delays. 🔴 Critical Security Considerations1. ESC Authentication PatternThe CLAUDE.md mentions that AWS commands must use ESC authentication: # Correct
esc run team-ce/default/aws go test -v -timeout=2h -tags aws ./...However, the GitHub Actions workflow runs tests directly without ESC wrapper. Ensure the CI environment has proper AWS credentials configured. 2. Resource Cleanup VerificationThe test framework has excellent cleanup utilities, but consider adding post-test verification to ensure no resources are left behind, especially important for the shared ca-central-1 account mentioned in CLAUDE.md. 📋 Deployment Pattern Validation✅ Excellent Stage DependenciesThe test properly follows the 8-stage EKS deployment pattern:
✅ Stack Reference CompatibilityTests properly use shared backend for cross-stack references with 🛠️ Code Quality AssessmentStrengths:
Minor Issues:
📊 Documentation and Maintainability✅ Excellent Documentation
Suggestion:Consider adding a troubleshooting section to the README for common test failures (token expiration, resource quota limits, etc.). 🎯 Final Recommendations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis is an excellent pull request that significantly improves the testing infrastructure for Pulumi Self-Hosted installers. The token management utilities, cleanup patterns, and service validation framework are particularly well-designed. The GitHub Actions improvements enhance security and maintainability. With the minor fixes suggested above, this PR provides a robust foundation for continuous testing of the EKS deployment. Recommendation: Approve with minor fixes |
da27e74 to
2f74012
Compare
|
Claude finished @rshade's task —— View job Pull Request Review: AWS EKS Testing FrameworkI've completed a comprehensive review of this PR that introduces AWS EKS testing infrastructure and GitHub Actions workflow improvements. Here's my detailed analysis: Review Checklist:
🟢 Strengths and Best Practices1. Excellent Test Framework Architecture
2. Production-Ready Configuration Management
3. Security Improvements
🟡 Areas for Improvement1. GitHub Actions Workflow Security# In .github/workflows/main.yml:15
- uses: actions/checkout@ff7abcd0c3c05ccf6adc123a8cd1fd4fb30fb493 # v4Issue: This still uses a commit SHA instead of the updated version tag pattern. Should be: - uses: actions/checkout@v42. AWS Region Configuration// In tests/aws_eks_ts_test.go:33
config := map[string]string{
"aws:region": "us-east-1",
}Recommendation: Consider making the AWS region configurable via environment variable to support multi-region testing and align with the ca-central-1 requirement mentioned in CLAUDE.md. 3. Test Timeout and Resource Limits# In .github/workflows/test-aws-eks.yml:27
timeout-minutes: 120Consideration: 120 minutes may be insufficient for the full 8-stage EKS deployment. Based on CLAUDE.md, EKS tests typically take ~2 hours. Consider increasing to 150 minutes to account for potential delays. 🔴 Critical Security Considerations1. ESC Authentication PatternThe CLAUDE.md mentions that AWS commands must use ESC authentication: # Correct
esc run team-ce/default/aws go test -v -timeout=2h -tags aws ./...However, the GitHub Actions workflow runs tests directly without ESC wrapper. Ensure the CI environment has proper AWS credentials configured. 2. Resource Cleanup VerificationThe test framework has excellent cleanup utilities, but consider adding post-test verification to ensure no resources are left behind, especially important for the shared ca-central-1 account mentioned in CLAUDE.md. 📋 Deployment Pattern Validation✅ Excellent Stage DependenciesThe test properly follows the 8-stage EKS deployment pattern:
✅ Stack Reference CompatibilityTests properly use shared backend for cross-stack references with 🛠️ Code Quality AssessmentStrengths:
Minor Issues:
📊 Documentation and Maintainability✅ Excellent Documentation
Suggestion:Consider adding a troubleshooting section to the README for common test failures (token expiration, resource quota limits, etc.). 🎯 Final Recommendations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis is an excellent pull request that significantly improves the testing infrastructure for Pulumi Self-Hosted installers. The token management utilities, cleanup patterns, and service validation framework are particularly well-designed. The GitHub Actions improvements enhance security and maintainability. With the minor fixes suggested above, this PR provides a robust foundation for continuous testing of the EKS deployment. Recommendation: Approve with minor fixes |
|
Claude finished @rshade's task —— View job Pull Request Review: AWS EKS Testing FrameworkI've completed a comprehensive review of this PR that introduces AWS EKS testing infrastructure and GitHub Actions workflow improvements. Here's my detailed analysis: Review Checklist:
🟢 Strengths and Best Practices1. Excellent Test Framework Architecture
2. Production-Ready Configuration Management
3. Security Improvements
🟡 Areas for Improvement1. GitHub Actions Workflow Security# In .github/workflows/main.yml:15
- uses: actions/checkout@ff7abcd0c3c05ccf6adc123a8cd1fd4fb30fb493 # v4Issue: This still uses a commit SHA instead of the updated version tag pattern. Should be: - uses: actions/checkout@v42. AWS Region Configuration// In tests/aws_eks_ts_test.go:33
config := map[string]string{
"aws:region": "us-east-1",
}Recommendation: Consider making the AWS region configurable via environment variable to support multi-region testing and align with the ca-central-1 requirement mentioned in CLAUDE.md. 3. Test Timeout and Resource Limits# In .github/workflows/test-aws-eks.yml:27
timeout-minutes: 120Consideration: 120 minutes may be insufficient for the full 8-stage EKS deployment. Based on CLAUDE.md, EKS tests typically take ~2 hours. Consider increasing to 150 minutes to account for potential delays. 🔴 Critical Security Considerations1. ESC Authentication PatternThe CLAUDE.md mentions that AWS commands must use ESC authentication: # Correct
esc run team-ce/default/aws go test -v -timeout=2h -tags aws ./...However, the GitHub Actions workflow runs tests directly without ESC wrapper. Ensure the CI environment has proper AWS credentials configured. 2. Resource Cleanup VerificationThe test framework has excellent cleanup utilities, but consider adding post-test verification to ensure no resources are left behind, especially important for the shared ca-central-1 account mentioned in CLAUDE.md. 📋 Deployment Pattern Validation✅ Excellent Stage DependenciesThe test properly follows the 8-stage EKS deployment pattern:
✅ Stack Reference CompatibilityTests properly use shared backend for cross-stack references with 🛠️ Code Quality AssessmentStrengths:
Minor Issues:
📊 Documentation and Maintainability✅ Excellent Documentation
Suggestion:Consider adding a troubleshooting section to the README for common test failures (token expiration, resource quota limits, etc.). 🎯 Final Recommendations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis is an excellent pull request that significantly improves the testing infrastructure for Pulumi Self-Hosted installers. The token management utilities, cleanup patterns, and service validation framework are particularly well-designed. The GitHub Actions improvements enhance security and maintainability. With the minor fixes suggested above, this PR provides a robust foundation for continuous testing of the EKS deployment. Recommendation: Approve with minor fixes |
- Add GitHub Actions workflow for EKS testing - Add comprehensive test suite in tests/ directory - Update EKS-hosted configuration for test compatibility - Add Makefile with test automation commands - Include token refresh and retry mechanisms for long-running tests
- Add GitHub Actions workflow for EKS testing - Add comprehensive test suite in tests/ directory - Update EKS-hosted configuration for test compatibility - Add Makefile with test automation commands - Include token refresh and retry mechanisms for long-running tests
- Add GitHub Actions workflow for EKS testing - Add comprehensive test suite in tests/ directory - Update EKS-hosted configuration for test compatibility - Add Makefile with test automation commands - Include token refresh and retry mechanisms for long-running tests
f122732 to
b72f05a
Compare
|
Claude finished @rshade's task —— View job EKS-Hosted Directory ReviewReviewing changes in eks-hosted/** directory for AWS EKS 8-stage deployment architecture. Review Checklist:
🟢 Excellent Additions - Test-Enabling Features1. Configurable Resource Protection PatternThe most significant improvement is the consistent addition of // eks-hosted/*/config.ts
const protectResources = pulumiConfig.getBoolean("protectResources") ?? true;✅ Perfect Implementation:
2. Excellent BYO Infrastructure SupportIAM stage ( // eks-hosted/01-iam/index.ts:20-26
if (config.eksServiceRoleName && config.eksInstanceRoleName && config.databaseMonitoringRoleArn) {
// Use existing roles via aws.iam.Role.get()
} else {
// Create new roles
}✅ Strong Design:
🟡 Areas for Improvement1. Stack Reference Naming InconsistenciesFound inconsistent stack reference patterns that could break inter-stage dependencies: Issue in // Inconsistent naming - should match project naming pattern
const clusterStackRef = new pulumi.StackReference(`${orgName}/selfhosted-05-ekscluster/${stackName}`);Should be: const clusterStackRef = new pulumi.StackReference(`${orgName}/selfhosted-05-eks-cluster/${stackName}`);Issue in 2. EKS Configuration Version Update
clusterVersion: "1.30"While 🔴 Critical Security Considerations1. Overly Broad IAM PermissionsIssue in const opensearchPolicy = new aws.iam.Policy("opensearchPolicy", {
policy: {
Statement: [{
Action: ["es:*"], // ⚠️ Too broad
Effect: "Allow",
Resource: "*" // ⚠️ Too broad
}]
}
});Recommendation: Follow principle of least privilege: Statement: [{
Action: [
"es:ESHttpGet",
"es:ESHttpPost",
"es:ESHttpPut",
"es:ESHttpDelete"
],
Effect: "Allow",
Resource: "arn:aws:es:${region}:${accountId}:domain/pulumi-insights/*"
}]🛡️ Security Strengths1. Proper Network Security
2. Database Security
3. Metadata Security
📋 Deployment Architecture Validation✅ Proper Stage DependenciesStack references correctly implement the 8-stage dependency chain:
✅ Configuration Management
🎯 Recommendations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR significantly enhances the EKS deployment's testability and production readiness. The configurable resource protection pattern is particularly well-implemented, enabling integration tests while maintaining security defaults. The BYO infrastructure support shows mature Infrastructure-as-Code patterns. Key strengths:
Minor fixes needed:
Recommendation: Approve with minor fixes |
|
Claude finished @rshade's task —— View job Pull Request Review: AWS EKS Testing FrameworkI've completed a comprehensive review of the repository-wide changes in this PR, focusing on shared utilities, CI/CD improvements, and documentation updates as requested. Review Summary:
🟢 Strengths and Best Practices1. Excellent Test Framework Architecture
2. Production-Ready Documentation
3. Security Improvements
4. Build Automation Excellence
🟡 Areas for Improvement1. Inconsistent GitHub Actions ModernizationIssue: Some workflows still use commit SHAs instead of version tags: # In .github/workflows/main.yml:15
- uses: actions/checkout@ff7abcd0c3c05ccf6adc123a8cd1fd4fb30fb493 # v4
# In .github/workflows/pr-test.yml:21
- uses: actions/checkout@ff7abcd0c3c05ccf6adc123a8cd1fd4fb30fb493 # v4Recommendation: Update remaining workflows to use 2. Test Timeout Configuration# In .github/workflows/test-aws-eks.yml:27
timeout-minutes: 120Consideration: Based on CLAUDE.md documentation stating EKS tests take ~2 hours, consider increasing to 150 minutes to account for potential delays and ensure reliability. 3. AWS Region ConfigurationThe test framework hardcodes 🟢 Security AssessmentCredential Management
Resource Management
📋 Code Quality AssessmentGo Code Standards
Test Utilities
🎯 Final RecommendationsCritical (Must Fix)
Important (Should Fix)
Nice to Have
✅ Overall AssessmentThis is an excellent pull request that significantly enhances the repository's testing infrastructure and CI/CD practices. The test framework demonstrates sophisticated understanding of Pulumi deployment patterns, AWS token management, and production-ready testing practices. Key Highlights:
Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor fixes The identified issues are primarily cosmetic (inconsistent SHA usage) and configuration improvements. The core architecture and implementation are production-ready and follow Pulumi best practices. |
This pull request updates several GitHub Actions workflows to use versioned action tags (like
@v4or@v1) instead of full commit SHAs, and introduces a new workflow for AWS EKS testing. The main goals are to simplify maintenance, keep actions up-to-date, and add automated EKS test coverage.Workflow maintenance and modernization:
Updated all referenced GitHub Actions in workflow files (such as
auto-approve.yml,main.yml,pr-test.yml, andtest-with-minio.yml) to use versioned tags (e.g.,@v4,@v1, etc.) instead of hardcoded commit SHAs, making future updates easier and reducing risk of using outdated actions. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]Replaced deprecated or renamed actions with their recommended alternatives, such as switching from
pascalgn/merge-actiontopascalgn/automerge-action, and fromactions/create-releaseandactions/upload-release-assettoshogo82148/actions-create-releaseandshogo82148/actions-upload-release-asset. [1] [2] [3]New AWS EKS test workflow:
.github/workflows/test-aws-eks.ymlto automate AWS EKS tests on pull requests and workflow dispatch, including environment setup, AWS credentials, Pulumi CLI installation, test execution, and artifact upload. This workflow triggers when relevant files change or thetest:aws-ekslabel is present.These changes collectively improve workflow reliability, security, and test coverage for AWS EKS.