Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gvsoc ci #142

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Gvsoc ci #142

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

haugoug
Copy link
Member

@haugoug haugoug commented May 16, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@colluca colluca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution @haugoug!

I have a few major comments:

  • To add the GVSoC tests to the CI the workflow file needs to be adapted as well, see
    ./util/run.py sw/run.yaml --simulator verilator -j
  • For all tests which make use of the IPC verification interface (i.e. those which have no BIST verification), just running the binaries with GVSoC doesn't really check anything. Perhaps we want to extend the IPC verification interface to work also with GVSoC, otherwise we just need to make clear that the GVSoC simulation will not really verify those tests.

Minor comments follow on the code.

Comment on lines +99 to +113
class GvsocSimulator(RTLSimulator):
"""Gvsoc simulator

An [RTL simulator][Simulator.RTLSimulator], identified by the name
`vsim`, tailored to the creation of
[Gvsoc simulations][Simulation.GvsocSimulation].
"""

def __init__(self, binary):
"""Constructor for the GvsocSimulator class.

Arguments:
binary: The Gvsoc simulation binary.
"""
super().__init__(binary, name='gvsoc', simulation_cls=GvsocSimulation)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does it inherit from the RTLSimulator class?

target/snitch_cluster/sw/apps/common.mk Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants