Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added failing test with 2 replications #641

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

added failing test with 2 replications #641

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gvuyk
Copy link
Contributor

@gvuyk gvuyk commented May 13, 2018

This PR contains:

Test case

Describe the problem you have

#630

@pubkey
Copy link
Owner

pubkey commented May 16, 2018

Hi @gvuyk Thank you for the test.
I think the problem is that you directly use the collections pouchdb-instance as remote. Please use the collection itself, than it works for me.

Instead of:
remote: collectionA.pouch,

Use:
remote: collectionA,

The reason is that rxdb does not per default listen to the pouchdb's changes because it has a performance-cost. But when the collection is used in a replication, rxdb starts listening.

pubkey added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2018
@gvuyk
Copy link
Contributor Author

gvuyk commented May 17, 2018

Nice! Can confirm the problem is gone
Thanks again

@gvuyk gvuyk closed this May 17, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants