Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Deps For Capella #12067

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 2, 2023
Merged

Update Deps For Capella #12067

merged 9 commits into from
Mar 2, 2023

Conversation

nisdas
Copy link
Member

@nisdas nisdas commented Mar 1, 2023

What type of PR is this?

Dependency Update

What does this PR do? Why is it needed?

This updates our go-ethereum dependency to v1.11.2 and lighthouse dependency to v3.5.0 . These are capella compatible versions for both clients which should allow us to test them out properly in our E2E tests.

Which issues(s) does this PR fix?

N.A

Other notes for review

@nisdas nisdas added the Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review label Mar 1, 2023
@nisdas nisdas requested a review from a team as a code owner March 1, 2023 11:56
@nisdas nisdas removed the Ready For Review A pull request ready for code review label Mar 1, 2023
rkapka
rkapka previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2023
rkapka
rkapka previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2023
@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

Blocked by bazel-contrib/rules_go#3411

@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

Unblocked by 19c3741

prestonvanloon
prestonvanloon previously approved these changes Mar 1, 2023
Copy link
Member

@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I applied a workaround for zstd

@prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

prestonvanloon commented Mar 1, 2023

Tests fail for //beacon-chain/execution:go_default_test

assertions.go:103: check_transition_config_test.go:243 Unexpected error: got an unexpected error in JSON-RPC response: missing required field 'parentHash' for Header

@nisdas
Copy link
Member Author

nisdas commented Mar 2, 2023

It seems like this was because of this PR:
ethereum/go-ethereum#26723

Copy link
Member

@prestonvanloon prestonvanloon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not a fan of the hacky patch, but I am guessing it will break again on their next release?

@nisdas
Copy link
Member Author

nisdas commented Mar 2, 2023

I'm not a fan of the hacky patch, but I am guessing it will break again on their next release?

I dont think so, this seems like it was because the geth team fixed a long-standing bug and our test relied on that bug to pass. I don't expect this to break anymore. In anycase this test is testing a function that is cosmetic and deprecated after the merge, so not a big issue.

@prylabs-bulldozer prylabs-bulldozer bot merged commit 196798e into develop Mar 2, 2023
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the updateDepsCapella branch March 2, 2023 03:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants