-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add chip to the DRM parser class #672
Open
Deezzir
wants to merge
5
commits into
prometheus:master
Choose a base branch
from
Deezzir:drm-hwmon-name
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need to sanitize the name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's something that the hwmon does with the chip names as well, so the format is similar.
See: https://github.com/prometheus/node_exporter/blob/e6a9cfbdcdaa21bf9676c6cd37bef8160227f423/collector/hwmon_linux.go#L74
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes but in that case its used to construct the metric name, which has more limitations. Here its being used as label value, where I don't think we need this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think it will still be the same and relatable by the chip from the hwmon? It seems like a good idea to align the result to what the hwmon does with its chip names
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess in the node-exporter we should also just use the raw chip name and put it in a label instead of the metric name. But I think either way, here, this being used as label value, it should not get santized. But want tohave @SuperQ opinion on this as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A clarification - I don't care if it is sanitized or not; the only reason I am doing a sanitization here is to align the label
chip
coming from the hwmon metrics (which is also sanitized as per the permalink I provided above) to a new label I've added to thenode_drm_card_info
metric.I want to match, aka join a metric like
node_hwmon_fan_rpm
withnode_drm_card_info
and have a connection between the two collectors. RN, there is no way to match the metrics coming from those collectors, although both provide metrics for GPUs.Sanitizing the label before the match makes sense because this is what's being done for the
chip
label in the hwmon collector.If you think we shouldn't sanitize the hwmon chip label in the node_exporter, I might provide a PR for that. As of now, I am aligning the behaviour with the existing solution.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah makes sense, let's see what @SuperQ is thinking about this. I'm fine either way but moving chip to a label in the hwmon collector makes most sense to me.