-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support ObjectName patterns in excludeObjectNameAttributes #897
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: kgedminas <kgedminas@eisgroup.com>
ec528ab
to
d91e138
Compare
@KestasG thanks for the PR! Can you provide an example exporter YAML configuration showing your usage? |
I've started with
and later realized that simpler definition works as well:
Will try to get the test next week. |
You should be able to base it on... If you have any questions, ping me. |
Added integration test Signed-off-by: Kestutis <kgedminas@eisgroup.com>
Added integration test. While writing a test realized that it makes little sense to keep old implementation, checking object names by exact match, so removed it. |
Hello! I've stumbled on the same problem. What's the status of this? Can it be merged in near future? |
@KestasG can you rebase this PR? |
Working on local project encountered performance issues with bean scraping. While analyzing found out that there are lot of unused attributes being tested against rules and taking significant amount of time. It is impossible to list all objects in excludeObjectNameAttributes as there are thousands of them, so decided to add pattern support for it. This allowed to reduce scraping time from 3.9 sec to 1.9 sec.