Tracking issue: Full integration of Example models

[EwoutH]

With the core examples being merged back into Mesa in #2358 and now available in examples we can now start working our checklist:

• Divide models in stable/basic and experimental/advanced models
• Create two folders in Mesa examples: examples/basic and examples/advanced
• Move over those 9 examples from mesa-examples, retaining git history.
• Remove from Mesa-examples (@EwoutH, Remove core examples from mesa-examples mesa-examples#225
• Update the examples, to:
  • Use a standard structure: agents.py, model.py and app.py
    • basic examples (@EwoutH, Cleanup and restructure basic example models #2365)
    • advanced examples (@EwoutH) (Cleanup and restructure EpsteinCivilViolence and PdGrid examples #2408, Reorganize advanced examples: wolf_sheep and sugarscape_g1mt #2410)
  • Use the latest features and be implemented elegantly
  • Use the latest visualisation
    • basic examples (@EwoutH, Cleanup and restructure basic example models #2365)
    • advanced examples (Cleanup and restructure EpsteinCivilViolence and PdGrid examples #2408, Reorganize advanced examples: wolf_sheep and sugarscape_g1mt #2410)
• Include them in Read the Docs (@quaquel, like currently on the EMAworkbench)
• Update all other docs and readmes to point towards the new location
• Integrate the benchmarks models in them and run benchmarks on them (@EwoutH)
• Update the tests to run continuous testing (Test SolaraViz in CI mesa-examples#215)
• Add visualisation testing (Test SolaraViz in CI mesa-examples#215)
• We add batch_run testing (Test batch_run more extensive in CI #2184, Test batch_run examples in CI #2185, test_examples.py: Add batch_run tests mesa-examples#144)
• Include examples in coverage add advanced examples to rtd #2413
• Enabling ruff and/or ruff-format on (parts of) the examples (in pyproject.toml).
  • basic examples (excluding docstring: Ruff basic examples #2370)
  • advanced examples reactivate ruff for advanced examples and include them in tests #2414
• Make examples importable (e.g., from mesa.examples import BoltzmannWealthModel) (Importable examples #2381)
• rework examples landing page on RTD. It should include installation instructions for the examples and should use the examples readme.md.

Feel free to add items, and put your name behind something if you want to pick it up!

[quaquel]

I'll pick up the read the docs stuff as discussed today.

[EwoutH]

@quaquel Awesome! #2365 structures all basic example models to have a flat structure and at least agents.py and model.py, I think that should help.

[EwoutH]

• The moved examples are removed from mesa-examples: Remove core examples from mesa-examples mesa-examples#225
• The basic examples have had an extensive update: Cleanup and restructure basic example models #2365

I'm going to focus on my thesis for a few days, but happy to review anything!

[Corvince]

Just a heads-up that this broke the docs build for the visualization tutorial, because mesa-examples does no longer provide the BoltzmannWealthModel. The vis tutorial does need a larger update anyways (which I somewhere agreed to do), but still this is a major breaking change that we need to communicate somehow.
https://readthedocs.org/projects/mesa/builds/25963527/

Or maybe easier is to provide the same "model export" in core mesa and then just re-export that from mesa-examples. Thats probably the better path now that I think of it. I'll add "make examples importable" to the checklist

[Corvince]

[ ] Discuss enabling ruff and/or ruff-format on (parts of) the examples (in pyproject.toml).

Curious as to why this needs a discussion? I am strongly in favor of enabling it. Whats a reason against it?

[EwoutH]

Just a heads-up that this broke the docs build for the visualization tutorial, because mesa-examples does no longer provide the BoltzmannWealthModel.

I just noticed it also. That's just an question of updating the path to import from mesa/examples/basic, right?

Let's give @tpike3 a chance to finish his tutorial and then go from there.

Curious as to why this needs a discussion? I am strongly in favor of enabling it. Whats a reason against it?

Against: It's a lot of work ;). I made an start in #2370. Docstring we should consider if we want to add and require that everywhere.

[quaquel]

I agree its some work but not as bad as what I did a few weeks back with the docstrings. With @Corvince, I believe that we should just enable it and fix all issues. The examples should exemplify good practices.

[EwoutH]

• Make examples importable (e.g. from mesa.examples import BoltzmannWealthModel)

@Corvince this means we also have to move them from examples to mesa/examples, right? Or can we make them importable in another way?

[Corvince]

Not sure, I checked and experimented briefly. There is an extensive hatch documentation about file selection
https://hatch.pypa.io/latest/config/build/#file-selection

From skimming it might be possible from examples, but I don't know if it can automatically be included as "mesa.examples". Someone should figure this out