Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Windowcovering testcase [TC-WNCV-4.5] - Result is not matched with the expected outcome #16007

Closed
somu1710 opened this issue Mar 9, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #16841
Closed

Comments

@somu1710
Copy link

somu1710 commented Mar 9, 2022

In window covering test case [TC-WNCV-4.5] - While executing the commands result is not matched with the expected outcome after the reboot of DUT. Execution of CurrentPositionLiftPercent100ths and CurrentPositionTiltPercent100ths we have to reboot and restart the dut . After that we have to execute the same commands the result should be match . but the the result is not equal.

  • expected behavior - currentLiftValB == currentLiftValA , 9000=9000
  • actual behavior - currentLiftValB is not equal to currentLiftValA. ValA = 9000 and ValB = 500

Actual steps - ./chip-tool windowcovering read current-position-lift-percent100ths 1 1
./chip-tool windowcovering read current-position-tilt-percent100ths 1 1
Here I attach the screenshot for your reference
Before reboot
WNCV 1

After reboot
WNCV 2

For your reference here i attach the draftTE8 link
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1h4d4J90KAxFqUL_cXZHyM3pHjHCEXzFITkQhN2KMqDY/edit#gid=1142031664

@somu1710
Copy link
Author

somu1710 commented Apr 6, 2022

still we are facing the same issue after reboot of dut again we have to repair and execute the command it shows a different value for the CurrentPositionLiftPercent100ths and CurrentPositionTiltPercent100ths .

expected behavior - currentLiftValB == currentLiftValA , 9000=9000
actual behavior - currentLiftValB is not equal to currentLiftValA. ValA = 9000 and ValB = 500

Before reboot - 9000
After reboot - 500

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant