Added integration tests for TypeScript, React, and Vuejs

[pratham-radadiya]

Added integration tests

Resolves #7938

Changes:

• Introduced integration test setup for TypeScript, React, and Vuejs using ESM build

• TypeScript tests validate declaration accuracy using tsc --noEmit

• React tests check usage in a TSX component with hooks and class-based sketches

• Vue tests use vue-tsc to verify type compatibility in .vue files

• Updated .eslintrc and Gruntfile.js to pass lint and fix style warnings

• npm run lint passes

• Inline reference is included / updated

• Unit tests are included / updated (integration tests added for ESM usage in TS, React, and Vue)

[welcome]

🎉 Thanks for opening this pull request! For guidance on contributing, check out our contributor guidelines and other resources for contributors!
🤔 Please ensure that your PR links to an issue, which has been approved for work by a maintainer; otherwise, there might already be someone working on it, or still ongoing discussion about implementation. You are welcome to join the discussion in an Issue if you're not sure!
🌸 Once your PR is merged, be sure to add yourself to the list of contributors on the readme page !

Thank You!

[error-four-o-four]

Wow, that was quick @pratham-radadiya

Unfortunately I do not have the time to take a closer look yet but I noticed that you're requesting these changes on the main brach, which is v1.x. Intentionally the idea was to create these tests for v2.x to test the generated typescript declarations (they do not exist in v1.x).

But still in my opinion your work/PR is worth to keep.

[pratham-radadiya]

hyy, @error-four-o-four

should i change the main branch? or, there was a issue in the code.

[error-four-o-four]

It would be great if you could change the base branch frommain to dev-2.0.

Please be aware that there will be merge confilcts especially in rollup.config.mjs. You could also create a new PR because it might be easier.

'rollup' and 'vitest' are already listet as dependencies in the dev-2.0 branch. So there's no need to introduce 'jest'