Repository navigation
fix(debug): avoid retaining query objects when logging is disabled - #30556
akasakariko wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: prisma/orm/.coderabbit.yml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDebug history now stores summarized arguments for disabled calls and original arguments for enabled calls. Tests cover argument values, logging behavior, history limits, truncation, and clearing. ChangesDebug history recording
Priority: ➖ Normal Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Change: Bug fix · Severity of issue fixed: Medium Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change stops disabled debug calls from keeping large objects alive in history while preserving enabled-call behavior. No merge-blocking risk was identified. Security Architecture ReviewSecurity architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The change reduces retention of query objects when logging is disabled and preserves the inspected credential-protection control. However, Error messages now become visible in diagnostic history and shareable report links. No actual secret disclosure was established, but message sensitivity and downstream report coverage remain incompletely assessed. Retained concerns
Security review detailsSecurity Blast Radius
Security Findings and Attack Paths
Trust Boundaries and Controls
Resilience and Maintainability Implications
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 33.33% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 3 functions across 2 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Signed-off-by: KayanoLiam <Kayano04@outlook.jp>
358fe2f to
318fd09
Compare
|
Hi, just a friendly ping. This PR is ready for review whenever you have a chance. Happy to address any feedback |
Summary
Fixes #30494
[Object]Validation
Scope
v7as requested in the issueSummary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation