chore: replace find-up -> empathic #205
Conversation
|
|
""" WalkthroughThe changes update the codebase to replace the use of the "find-up" package with the "empathic" package for finding VCS directories. The relevant import statements and directory detection logic in the Git and Mercurial modules are updated accordingly, and the dependency is changed in package.json. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant GitModule
participant EmpathicFind
Caller->>GitModule: detect(directory)
GitModule->>EmpathicFind: find.up('.git', { cwd: directory })
EmpathicFind-->>GitModule: path or null
GitModule-->>Caller: dirname(path) or null
sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant HgModule
participant EmpathicFind
Caller->>HgModule: detect(directory)
HgModule->>EmpathicFind: find.up('.hg', { cwd: directory })
EmpathicFind-->>HgModule: path or null
HgModule->>HgModule: check if path is directory
HgModule-->>Caller: dirname(path) or null
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. |
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 73c364d in 1 minute and 23 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
95lines of code in3files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. package.json:60
- Draft comment:
Dependency change: Ensure that empathic’s behavior is fully compatible with find-up, particularly in how it resolves both file and directory entries for .git/.hg. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is asking the PR author to ensure compatibility between dependencies, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation or testing of behavior. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue.
2. src/scms/git.ts:9
- Draft comment:
The simplified detect logic now uses find.up and returns path.dirname(found). Verify that this uniformly handles cases where .git might be a file or directory, as the previous logic differentiated between these cases. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the author to verify the behavior of the new logic, which is against the rules. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a clear issue with the code. Therefore, it should be removed.
3. src/scms/hg.ts:9
- Draft comment:
The detect function for hg now returns path.dirname(found) when found. Note that if no .hg directory is found it implicitly returns undefined, whereas the git.ts detect returns null. Consider unifying the return type for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment identifies a real inconsistency, I can't verify if git.ts actually returns null without seeing that file. The comment requires cross-file context which violates our rules. Additionally, this type inconsistency existed before the change - it wasn't introduced by this PR. The inconsistency could be a real issue that affects type safety in the codebase. Maybe we should keep comments about type safety even if they're about pre-existing issues? No - our rules are clear that we should only comment on changes introduced by the PR, and that we should ignore cross-file issues. We can't verify the git.ts behavior without more context. Delete this comment because it discusses a pre-existing cross-file issue rather than a problem introduced by the changes in this PR.
Workflow ID: wflow_79BKNOOd0XxISLn6
You can customize 
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/scms/git.ts (1)
9-11: Fix inconsistency with hg.ts return value.The function correctly implements the simplified detection logic. However, there's an inconsistency: this function explicitly returns
nullwhen not found, while the equivalent function insrc/scms/hg.ts(lines 10-11) implicitly returnsundefined.For consistency, consider updating
src/scms/hg.tsto also explicitly returnnull:export const detect = (directory: string) => { const found = find.up('.hg', { cwd: directory }) - if (found) return path.dirname(found) + return found ? path.dirname(found) : null }Alternatively, update this function to match hg.ts:
export const detect = (directory: string) => { const found = find.up('.git', { cwd: directory }) - return found ? path.dirname(found) : null + if (found) return path.dirname(found) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
package.json(1 hunks)src/scms/git.ts(1 hunks)src/scms/hg.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/scms/git.ts (2)
src/scms/hg.ts (2)
name(6-6)detect(8-11)src/scms/index.ts (1)
directory(6-16)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
package.json (1)
60-60:✅ Verification successful
Verify the empathic package version and security.
The dependency change from
find-uptoempathicaligns with the code changes. Please ensure this specific version is secure and compatible.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest version of the empathic npm package and are there any known security vulnerabilities?💡 Result:
Based on the search results, the latest version of the empathic npm package is 1.1.0, released approximately 2 weeks ago as of May 31, 2025[3]. The package is described as a set of small Node.js utilities designed to understand pathing needs. It offers multiple submodules like
empathic/findandempathic/packagethat are fast, modern, small in size, and safe with zero dependencies[3].Regarding security vulnerabilities, there is no specific information in the search results about any known security vulnerabilities for the empathic package itself. The package is described as "safe" and having "zero-dependency," which typically reduces the attack surface for potential vulnerabilities[3].
The empathic package includes several modules:
empathic/access: For checking file access/permissionsempathic/find: For finding files and directories by walking up parent directoriesempathic/package: Convenience helpers for dealing with package.json filesempathic/resolve: For resolving absolute pathsempathic/walk: For collecting parent directories of a target[3]While there is information about vulnerabilities in npm packages in general and the npm package manager itself, none of the search results specifically mention any security issues with the empathic package[6][9][10].
Citations:
- 1: https://docs.npmjs.com/about-semantic-versioning/
- 2: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@empathyco/x-components
- 3: https://github.com/lukeed/empathic
- 4: https://docs.npmjs.com/updating-your-published-package-version-number/
- 5: https://gist.github.com/jonlabelle/706b28d50ba75bf81d40782aa3c84b3e
- 6: https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/01/npm-incident-spam-vulnerability/
- 7: https://security.snyk.io/package/npm/npm
- 8: https://www.browserstack.com/guide/update-specific-package-using-npm
- 9: https://www.aquasec.com/cloud-native-academy/supply-chain-security/npm-vulnerabilities/
- 10: https://blog.checkpoint.com/securing-the-cloud/review-of-recent-npm-based-vulnerabilities/
Confirmed: empathic@1.1.0 is up-to-date and secure
The dependency upgrade from
find-upto"empathic": "^1.1.0"matches the latest release (v1.1.0, May 31 2025) and leverages its zero-dependency modules (e.g.empathic/find). No known security vulnerabilities have been reported. You can safely proceed with this change.src/scms/hg.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import updated correctly.The import change from
find-uptoempathic/findaligns with the dependency update and PR objectives.
9-11: LGTM: Detect function simplified as intended.The function correctly implements the simplified detection logic using
find.up(). The removal of thetype: 'directory'constraint aligns with the PR objective to remove the distinction between handling.hgfiles or directories.src/scms/git.ts (1)
3-3: LGTM: Import updated correctly.The import change from
find-uptoempathic/findaligns with the dependency update and PR objectives.
| if (hgDirectory) { | ||
| return path.dirname(hgDirectory) | ||
| } | ||
| const found = find.up('.hg', { cwd: directory }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's always a directory. If you have a .hg file your mercurial project would be broken
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nope, that just means there is a .hg file and it's not a mercurial project.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can stat the result to check if it's a directory, tho the odds of this happening is very low.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's how previous codes work. Dependency migration should not change any current behavior.
|
I just tried my own So it seems I'm not going to use By the way, IMO |
|
|
2 participants
Replaces
find-upwith a much lighter-weight, faster alternative. Doing so cleans up thedetectlogic (since there's no difference in handling.gitfiles or directories) and significantly (for this module) cleans up the dependency graph.engines.nodematchThis is part of the e18e initiative, which I believe @JounQin is active within.
Important
Replace
find-upwithempathicingit.tsandhg.ts, simplifying detection logic and reducing dependencies.find-upwithempathicinpackage.json.detectfunction ingit.tsandhg.tsusingempathic.fsimport fromgit.tsas it's no longer needed.engines.noderemains compatible with the new package.This description was created by
for 73c364d. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit