Skip to content

Conversation

@tdcmeehan
Copy link
Contributor

@tdcmeehan tdcmeehan commented Oct 31, 2025

Description

Sometimes it just seems more appropriate to use optimizer rather than planner.

Motivation and Context

More appropriate scopes

Impact

N/A

Test Plan

N/A

Contributor checklist

  • Please make sure your submission complies with our contributing guide, in particular code style and commit standards.
  • PR description addresses the issue accurately and concisely. If the change is non-trivial, a GitHub Issue is referenced.
  • Documented new properties (with its default value), SQL syntax, functions, or other functionality.
  • If release notes are required, they follow the release notes guidelines.
  • Adequate tests were added if applicable.
  • CI passed.
  • If adding new dependencies, verified they have an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.0 or higher (or obtained explicit TSC approval for lower scores).

Release Notes

== NO RELEASE NOTE ==

@tdcmeehan tdcmeehan requested review from a team, czentgr and unidevel as code owners October 31, 2025 20:08
@prestodb-ci prestodb-ci added the from:IBM PR from IBM label Oct 31, 2025
@prestodb-ci prestodb-ci requested review from a team and anandamideShakyan and removed request for a team October 31, 2025 20:08
@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

The pull request updates the continuous integration workflow for conventional commit validation by adding 'optimizer' to the list of recognized commit scopes.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Expanded the valid commit scopes in the CI workflow
  • Inserted 'optimizer' into the parser of recognized scopes in the conventional-commit-check.yml workflow
.github/workflows/conventional-commit-check.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@github-actions
Copy link

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

from:IBM PR from IBM

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants