Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to quasar 68.1.0 #166

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 15, 2018
Merged

Conversation

alissapajer
Copy link
Contributor

[ch1981]
[ch1968]

asData
})

stream.map(_.handleErrorWith {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to still handle errors like this. Let me see what jawnfs2 does with errors.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reinstated it.

Copy link
Contributor

@jsantos17 jsantos17 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately it seems like there's some sort of binary incompatibility with the newly introduced QData. Stack trace.

I'm not familiar with QData but this seems like a mismatched dependency.

@jsantos17
Copy link
Contributor

@alissapajer @djspiewak Tried it with sdbe-20.3.1 too and it fails too.

@djspiewak
Copy link
Contributor

It's because quasar hasn't been updated to 2.1.0 in the version depended upon by this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@jsantos17 jsantos17 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We just need to merge the PR bumping to 68.2.0 as soon as @slamdata-bot opens it.

@jsantos17 jsantos17 merged commit 637f1bf into precog:master Sep 15, 2018
jsantos17 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2018
(Merge branch 'djspiewak-update-quasar')

This is an extension of #166.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants