Support video params at the adunit level

[patmmccann]

Type of issue

Adapter rules

Description

With Prebid 4.0, #5237 was adopted, where publishers can expect to be able to set openrtb video params on the ad unit instead of having to repeat the parameter set up with differing requirements for every adapter they install. At that time and again with the #5966 proposal, it was announced that behavior would be enforced.

This is a rough computer-generated, person edited list of adapters supporting video but not reading many parameters from mediaTypes.video. There are other adapters not on this list only reading some parameters from that location which should also be fixed.

A great example of how to read from the correct place includes #6177 or https://github.com/stevealliance/Prebid.js/blob/a5ec2587abe94eae75300b52b7ccceaf70e78a41/modules/districtmDMXBidAdapter.js#L157

The following bid adapters read bidder-specific video params instead of using mediatypes, eg for parameter 'mimes'. Note, a more thorough review will be done before any enforcement action. If you don't think you should be on this list please comment:

https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/blob/master/modules/advangelistsBidAdapter.md @trchandraprakash
https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/blob/master/modules/dailyhuntBidAdapter.md @montu1996
https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/blob/master/modules/lemmaBidAdapter.md @lemmadev
https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/blob/master/modules/lunamediaBidAdapter.md @trchandraprakash
https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/blob/master/modules/waardexBidAdapter.md @yegorWaardex

These bid adapters have acknowledged the issue and have pending pr's:
https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/blob/master/modules/saambaaBidAdapter.md @trchandraprakash

Also related:
prebid/prebid.github.io#2158
#5536

[jsnellbaker]

Hi @patmmccann

Just want to clarify the intent of this change; it is meant to completely discourage bidders from setting any video params in the bidder params and they have to read everything from the mediaTypes.video field in an ORTB lense?

Or do bidders have to add more support for reading those values from the mediatTypes.video field, but they can continue to read values from the bidder params (preferring one over the other as mentioned in the related docs PR prebid/prebid.github.io#2158).

I ask because in reviewing/comparing the video params we use for our appnexus bidder with the params that are listed/described in the ORTB 2.5 spec for the video object, there's not always a straight transition. One of our fields context doesn't appear to exist at all as an available ORTB param (maybe I missed it), but even if it did - that (and a few other params) have extra values used by our system that are not supported by the ORTB spec.

If we're expected to go the former option described above, how are we supposed to resolve these differences when bidder-specific things do exist?

[patmmccann]

Hi @jsnellbaker ,rereading https://github.com/prebid/Prebid.js/pull/5536/files and #5237 ; I don't think anything outside of this list is a concern

mimes minduration maxduration protocols startdelay placement skip skipafter minbitrate maxbitrate delivery playbackmethod api linearity

Does that answer your question?

[jsnellbaker]

I'm not sure it does...

Does this overall ask in the 5.0 world mean bidders could still read values from their own bid.params.video field? Or no? Or is it only situational (like for a param that's not defined in the ORTB spec)? Or is there meant to be a tiered system, eg if a param isn't defined in the bidder.params, then try to check the mediaTypes.video to see if it's available there?

[patmmccann]

The latter option seems to go with the spirit of the requirement the best. The chief goal here is to increase publisher usability. If a publisher wishes to convey for example that playback type is click to play or that mime types is mp4, the hope is that the publisher could specify that once, but if the publisher and the ssp in partnership want to override what is communicated to other ssps and set a different value, that should be possible as well. What do you think? To elaborate a bit, the goal here isn't to be prescriptive on how to resolve conflicts between the ad unit and the parameters, it is more to reduce the necessity of a publisher to have repeating config for each bidder.

…

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021, 1:46 PM jsnellbaker ***@***.***> wrote: I'm not sure it does... Does this overall ask in the 5.0 world mean bidders could still read values from their own bid.params.video field? Or no? Or is it only situational (like for a param that's not defined in the ORTB spec)? Or is there meant to be a tiered system, eg if a param isn't defined in the bidder.params, then try to check the mediaTypes.video to see if it's available there? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6512 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAM25Z7YX63PV5RNR7NI3E3TKWRGNANCNFSM42HNWDIQ> .

[jsnellbaker]

Okay, thanks Patrick. It sounds like the last suggestion is the way to go.

I'll start to work on our bidder's updates along these lines.

[patmmccann]

@adam-browning you've previously mentioned AOL bid adapter has been replaced for video by onevideo. Can this line be safely deleted?

Prebid.js/modules/aolBidAdapter.js

Line 91 in 6c0142a

(imp.video && imp.video.mimes && imp.video.minduration && imp.video.maxduration));

[patmmccann]

solved for IX on #6691

[adam-browning]

Hey @patmmccann,

@adam-browning you've previously mentioned AOL bid adapter has been replaced for video by onevideo. Can this line be safely deleted?

This interpretation is not correct since Verizon Media/Yahoo has multiple platforms and different types of adapters that were developed independently by different R&D groups. Could we please postpone any changes at this time until we sync internally? I do not want to break anything without confirming with our stakeholders first.

I apologize in advance as my response time is limited in the next 2-3 weeks.
I appreciate your consideration,
Many thanks
Adam

[patmmccann]

Hi Adam, We're planning on doing the PR to remove all adapters from pbjs 5 still on the list above on Friday May 21. You have three options for your adapter: Accept the change I made Make your own changes Purge your adapter from pb 5 Thanks!

…

On Sat, May 15, 2021, 11:09 AM Adam Browning ***@***.***> wrote: Hey @patmmccann <https://github.com/patmmccann>, @adam-browning <https://github.com/adam-browning> you've previously mentioned AOL bid adapter has been replaced for video by onevideo. Can this line be safely deleted? This interpretation is not correct since Verizon Media/Yahoo has multiple platforms and different types of adapters that were developed independently by different R&D groups. Could we please postpone any changes at this time until we sync internally? I do not want to break anything without confirming with our stakeholders first. I apologize in advance as my response time is limited in the next 2-3 weeks. I appreciate your consideration, Many thanks Adam — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6512 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAM25Z3LP7MXCPBRR55LLTTTN2FCRANCNFSM42HNWDIQ> .