Skip to content

Review customer contact SQL change#5

Closed
prantikmedhi wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
demo/customer-contact-risk-review
Closed

Review customer contact SQL change#5
prantikmedhi wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
demo/customer-contact-risk-review

Conversation

@prantikmedhi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • expand the sample customer contact query to include realistic sensitive fields
  • add a short demo voiceover script for the three-minute walkthrough
  • create a PR that exercises the MetaReview comment flow against a believable SQL diff

Test plan

  • Open the PR and confirm the MetaReview workflow starts automatically
  • Check that the review comment calls out sensitive fields from the SQL diff
  • Review workflow logs if the action needs environment secrets or metadata access

Co-Authored-By: Claude GPT-5.4 <noreply@openclaude.dev>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 26, 2026

🛡️ MetaReview Data Risk Scan

Risk Level Score
🟡 MEDIUM 6.0/10

Verdict: Requires immediate attention to PII handling and access controls.

Summary

This Pull Request introduces examples/customer_contact_review.sql. The SQL snippet indicates the selection of sensitive customer contact information, including customer_full_name, phone_number, ssn, and credit_card, filtered by non-null email and phone_number.

Risks

  • Medium Risk (Score 6.0): The primary concern is the direct exposure of multiple highly sensitive PII fields (credit_card, email, phone_number, ssn).
  • Data Security: Directly querying and potentially exposing these PII fields increases the risk of unauthorized access, data breaches, and misuse if not managed with stringent security protocols.

Impact

  • Data Governance: Introduction of an asset containing these specific PII types requires strict adherence to existing data governance policies for sensitive data, including data access, retention, and usage.
  • Compliance: Depending on the data's jurisdiction and purpose, this could have significant compliance implications (e.g., GDPR, CCPA, PCI DSS).
  • Security Posture: Increases the overall security burden and potential attack surface for sensitive customer data within the platform.

Recommended Action

  1. Justification: Provide a clear and documented business justification for selecting each specific PII field (credit_card, ssn, email, phone_number) within this particular asset.
  2. Access Controls: Confirm and document that granular access controls are implemented for examples/customer_contact_review.sql to ensure only authorized personnel or systems with a legitimate need can access this sensitive data.
  3. Data Minimization: Evaluate if data masking, tokenization, or hashing can be applied to fields like credit_card and ssn if the full, unmasked values are not strictly required for the asset's intended purpose.
  4. Data Catalog Documentation: Ensure this new asset is fully documented in the data catalog, explicitly noting the sensitive PII it contains and its designated purpose.

@prantikmedhi prantikmedhi deleted the demo/customer-contact-risk-review branch April 26, 2026 19:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant