Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include /etc/rc.subr, required for wait_for_pids #155

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 6, 2016
Merged

Include /etc/rc.subr, required for wait_for_pids #155

merged 4 commits into from
May 6, 2016

Conversation

mariusvw
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #154

@pr1ntf
Copy link
Owner

pr1ntf commented Apr 30, 2016

Hey thanks!

I've got some other PR's queued for merging, but expect this to be merged soon ™️

@pr1ntf
Copy link
Owner

pr1ntf commented Apr 30, 2016

Please note that we have moved major functions into libraries, thus creating conflicts for this PR. Does this need to be kept where the PATH is set, or does it need to be kept where the scram function is?

Marius van Witzenburg added 3 commits May 2, 2016 09:45
* master:
  add freenas handbook link for tunables
  add bridge and tap modules at kmod time
  Add linebreak after iohyve command
  Adapt README and manpage to help output change
  Make setup help more zfsish
  Change help to distinguish mandatory parameters
  Enable copying of lib in Makefile
  Move functions from 'iohyve' into lib folder
@mariusvw
Copy link
Contributor Author

mariusvw commented May 2, 2016

I would personally load it before including the own library files. Not sure but something tells me that you are going to use the wait_for_pids more often.

But indeed, for now, in the scam function would work.

@pr1ntf
Copy link
Owner

pr1ntf commented May 6, 2016

Thanks for working on this! 🎉

@pr1ntf pr1ntf merged commit 6a9778c into pr1ntf:master May 6, 2016
@mariusvw mariusvw deleted the wait-for-pids branch June 2, 2016 08:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants