Skip to content

Support 9.4 and 9.5 #44

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 25, 2016
Merged

Support 9.4 and 9.5 #44

merged 8 commits into from
Feb 25, 2016

Conversation

solidsnack
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@solidsnack solidsnack changed the title Solidsnack pg9x Support 9.4 and 9.5 Feb 24, 2016
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
import sys
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why I removed this: didn't seem to break the build not to have it; and less is more.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love that this is not needed anymore. As long as bindgen can run we are good.

#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
#include "replication/output_plugin.h"
#include "replication/logical.h"
#include "replication/logical.h"
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we have this duplicate line?

@posix4e
Copy link
Owner

posix4e commented Feb 24, 2016

Looking good mostly. I'm curious how we want to test 9.5. Is it enough to test it on osx, and keep 9.4 on linux?

@solidsnack solidsnack closed this Feb 25, 2016
@solidsnack solidsnack reopened this Feb 25, 2016
posix4e added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2016
@posix4e posix4e merged commit a7acec1 into master Feb 25, 2016
@solidsnack solidsnack deleted the solidsnack-pg9x branch April 19, 2017 03:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants