Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Mark schema arg in read/scan_parquet as unstable #19018

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

nameexhaustion
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added internal An internal refactor or improvement python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars labels Sep 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.88%. Comparing base (4cd4ae6) to head (1a3dcff).
Report is 41 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19018      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.87%   79.88%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1524     1524              
  Lines      207722   207728       +6     
  Branches     2906     2908       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits       165914   165941      +27     
+ Misses      41259    41238      -21     
  Partials      549      549              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit e89e793 into pola-rs:main Sep 30, 2024
13 checks passed
@c-peters c-peters added the accepted Ready for implementation label Oct 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Ready for implementation internal An internal refactor or improvement python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants